TO & Vanderjagt - over or under?

LittleBoyBlue

Redvolution
Messages
35,766
Reaction score
8,411
adding these players makes us good for atleast 13 points every game?

over or under?
 
over

vandy should hit more than just a FG, or three EP a game, and TO should average a TD a game
 
We averaged 20.3 points per game last year, if we had averaged 7 points more ppg, we would´ve been 3th in the NFL just behind Indy. So I would say under.

If we averaged 10 or more points per game we would´ve been 1st in the NFL by al least 2 points per game.
 
Yeah, it's not just a straight up trade off. Like, TO might be good for 7-8 more TDs than Key every year. Vanderjagt might make 6 FGs that our kickers would have missed.

Our offensive line is going to be much more important, in the ppg.
 
YoMick said:
adding these players makes us good for atleast 13 points every game?

over or under?

It should make us good for at least 13 points a game. After all we had 20 without them.:laugh1:
 
Under.

Vandy probably adds 10 fg's for the season that we missed. That's 30 points.

Key scored 6 TDs last year, adding TO probably adds another 6 to that total, that's another 36 points.

66 points from those two players, approximately 5 a game. Should open up the offense for everyone else though.....
 
I would say the projections are as follows:

Owens - 9 TD's

Why?

He's averaged roughly 9 more TD's per 16 game season than Keyshawn. He's played in some pass first type of offense, but so has Keyshawn with TB.


Vanderjagt - 5 FG's

It's projected that Vanderjagt will go 25 for 28 in FG's. Going 7-7 from 20-29 yards, 7-8 from 30-39 yards, 8-10 from 40-49 yards, and 2-3 from 50+

Cundiff projects to go 20 for 28 on FGS.

In all, that's 78 total points (9 x 7) + (5 x 3)

And that's 4.9 points more per game.


Rich..................
again, just projections. Not a sure thing.
 
TheHustler said:
Under.

Vandy probably adds 10 fg's for the season that we missed. That's 30 points.

Key scored 6 TDs last year, adding TO probably adds another 6 to that total, that's another 36 points.

66 points from those two players, approximately 5 a game. Should open up the offense for everyone else though.....

Something that Dargonking mentioned was Vandy and his extra points... he should be good for atleat 2-3 extra points per game and one FG = 5-6 points alone... TO should be good for almost a TD per game IMO.

I say on the conservative side UNDER = 6 points for TO and 5 for Vandy = 11 points added to what they rest of the team scores.

I really want to HOPE for OVER = 14-17... I know, I know but we can dream...
 
I would say under 13.

Vandy should get 120 by himself I would think.

TO should have between 10-13 TD's so give him 70

That would be right at 12 a game. Not 12 pts more per game but 12 between the two.
 
YoMick said:
Something that Dargonking mentioned was Vandy and his extra points... he should be good for atleat 2-3 extra points per game and one FG = 5-6 points alone... TO should be good for almost a TD per game IMO.

I say on the conservative side UNDER = 6 points for TO and 5 for Vandy = 11 points added to what they rest of the team scores.

I really want to HOPE for OVER = 14-17... I know, I know but we can dream...

Except you have to subtract what we lose from Key and Cundiff/Cortez/Suisham.

It's not like we get additonal extra points with Vandy.
 
I dont know if 13 points a game is a fair assesment.I see @ least 3 to 4 more wins than last season being a real possibility.
 
djdoug said:
I dont know if 13 points a game is a fair assesment.I see @ least 3 to 4 more wins than last season being a real possibility.

I see your point... I was just thinking about how many games were we only ahead by a few points and blew it at the end... I was looking for the cushion that the addition of these two players would add to the points total...

I will take the 3-4 wins of course :)
 
I don't care how many points just as long as we get the W
 
I think TO gives us at least one TD per game average that would've been a FG attempt = +4 per game
V-Jerk should give us at least 3 more per game because TO will mean more trips to the red zone and Cundiff consistently missed there.

overall +7 average over what we were scoring last year.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,024
Messages
13,843,117
Members
23,784
Latest member
bedrmbby
Back
Top