cowboys19 New Member Messages 1,577 Reaction score 0 Dec 25, 2006 #1 that's sad, especially considering most of his rushing yards came in garbage time, where he had the whole middle of the field to run
that's sad, especially considering most of his rushing yards came in garbage time, where he had the whole middle of the field to run
sacowboysfan513 Well-Known Member Messages 1,998 Reaction score 44 Dec 25, 2006 #2 are u serious? what were the stats on him rushing? what were jj's #'s?
cowboys19 New Member Messages 1,577 Reaction score 0 Dec 25, 2006 #3 sacowboysfan513;1259920 said: are u serious? what were the stats on him rushing? what were jj's #'s? Click to expand... Tony Romo 3-42 yards Julius Jones 10-38 yards Marion Barber 6-3 yards so take away Romo and we have 16 rushes for 41 yards
sacowboysfan513;1259920 said: are u serious? what were the stats on him rushing? what were jj's #'s? Click to expand... Tony Romo 3-42 yards Julius Jones 10-38 yards Marion Barber 6-3 yards so take away Romo and we have 16 rushes for 41 yards
Future Intramural Legend Messages 27,566 Reaction score 14,714 Dec 25, 2006 #4 Against the 2nd worse rush defense in football... why against them and the colts were we unable to run the football. THe only thing i can think of is scheme. For god's sake the texans ran all over the colts
Against the 2nd worse rush defense in football... why against them and the colts were we unable to run the football. THe only thing i can think of is scheme. For god's sake the texans ran all over the colts
Mr Cowboy Well-Known Member Messages 26,654 Reaction score 32,742 Dec 25, 2006 #5 Yeah but Romo couldn't cover anyone in the secondary, or bring consistant pressure on Garcia.........................
Yeah but Romo couldn't cover anyone in the secondary, or bring consistant pressure on Garcia.........................