Walter Payton handled himself on the field like I wish all of them did. He acted as if he'd always been there and belonged. A hell of a lot better than Emmitt taking his helmet off so the fans could get a better look at him and creating another Cowboys rule.
To me football is a microcosm of what is happening in democratic society in general. There will always be a fight between the primacy of the individual versus the primacy of the herd.
Which approach is the correct one? I think it comes down to personal opinion. As a football fan what do yo care and want for most? A team player or a exceptionally talented individual?
Who wins more games?
When the going gets rough (extended losing streak/loss of critical game) what do you desire the most?
For me I personally prefer the latter, and care more about the primacy of the herd. I prefer a strong locker room. Don't get me wrong, I like talent. It's just that if you don't have consistent play making talent you aren't worth the hassle of the work it would take to make a team player out of you.
The sad part of the progression of the league is that great Hall of Fame type players like Irvin, who was a serious pain in the butt, and a morally corrupt person as a young man, started a trend due to his exceptional talent and dedication to football that lesser players have now adopted.
The tragedy is the players think it is acceptable to gesticulate on the field after a play, but aren't willing to pay the price on the practice field to be a winning team mate like Irvin did.