Dalmations202
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,607
- Reaction score
- 1,117
Smith, Slater, Parsons, Farley (no particular order)
Not sure how the Farley physical goes, but he would be the one taken IF he passes all the physical stuff -- if not, he is off the board
Slater isn't needed, IMO....too much money invested already in the OL.
Smith -- do you have any trades you are contemplating with Gallup, if not, you are about to have too much money tied up in the WR group to keep him anyway.
Parsons --- biggest need if he can play Mike. Not so much if you see him as a Will, which can be played by Smith, LVE, etc.
So 1) Farley - if physical pans out
if not) Parsons - if they see him as a Mike who can stack and shed, and has great instincts
if not) Smith - if they have talked to people about a Gallup trade
if not) Slater - with the understanding that one of the big pay OL will not be getting another contract.
Not sure how the Farley physical goes, but he would be the one taken IF he passes all the physical stuff -- if not, he is off the board
Slater isn't needed, IMO....too much money invested already in the OL.
Smith -- do you have any trades you are contemplating with Gallup, if not, you are about to have too much money tied up in the WR group to keep him anyway.
Parsons --- biggest need if he can play Mike. Not so much if you see him as a Will, which can be played by Smith, LVE, etc.
So 1) Farley - if physical pans out
if not) Parsons - if they see him as a Mike who can stack and shed, and has great instincts
if not) Smith - if they have talked to people about a Gallup trade
if not) Slater - with the understanding that one of the big pay OL will not be getting another contract.
