Would this be reasonable to you guys???

[lqmac1]

Say we trade out of the nine to maybe somewhere in the teens and select the best OL available. Then we package up a few trade picks and slide back into the end of the first maybe with the pat's they always trade out and select Rahim Moore???

 

[JBS]

no, i don't like Moore..

I'd be sooooo down to do your exact scenario and land Carimi and Harris though

 

[realtick]

I don't think you'll have to trade back into the 1st round to grab Moore, there is a good chance he'll be there at #40 if you still want him.

 

[MarionBarberThe4th]

I think Moore might be available in the 3rd to be honest.

 

[AsthmaField]

I know most wouldn't like it, but I'd like it if we traded back and drafted Ingram and them moved back into the late first and got Carimi.

Talk about jump start the running game.

No to Moore though. He would be there at 40 if that's what we wanted.

 

[Picksix]

I know most wouldn't like it, but I'd like it if we traded back and drafted Ingram and them moved back into the late first and got Carimi.

Talk about jump start the running game.

No to Moore though. He would be there at 40 if that's what we wanted.

Can't see them using a first on a RB. Especially with Garrett telling the FWST that Felix was the main man now.

As for trading back in the first to get an OL, okay, as long as that OL is at the top of their board.

I listened to Stephen Jones on NFL radio yesterday, and he said that they tired of being burned by drafting for need, and not staying true to their board. So if trading down gets them more picks, and they take guys at the top of their board, then I'm fine with trading down.