Would You Put Yourself In Grave Danger To Prevent A Nuclear Meltdown?

[casmith07]

This should be an interesting poll. I saw it on CNN.com, and thought I'd ask football fans, since we tend to be a different breed from most.

The CNN poll is basically 50/50 right now.

So, what say you, Zoners? Would you put yourself in grave danger to prevent a nuclear meltdown?

 

[Cowboy Brian]

I am super R2A, no doubt

 

[StanleySpadowski]

No because a "meltdown" isn't nearly as serious as most people seem to think.

 

[CowboyDan]

No because a "meltdown" isn't nearly as serious as most people seem to think.

So then why wouldn't you do it? The "ignorant" world would consider you a hero.

 

[YosemiteSam]

No because a "meltdown" isn't nearly as serious as most people seem to think.

This is a relative to who you are talking about. A meltdown *is* a serious matter. Apparently, some people also think it isn't as serious as it actually is.

You said you lived near Three Mile Island in 1979. You do realize that Three Mile Island wasn't a complete meltdown right? It never breached of the walls of the containment building. If it had breached the walls, that would of been a huge disaster.

 

[bbgun]

Yes, I would expose myself to radiation to save the Enterprise.

 

[BrAinPaiNt]

I guess it depends where it happens.

There are only a handful of People I love enough to die over.

For the others...screw them. :

 

[BrAinPaiNt]

Yes, I would expose myself to radiation to save the Enterprise.

Would you mind meld with Bones first?

 

[YosemiteSam]

Would you mind meld with Bones first?

...must...resist....commenting.

 

[bbgun]

Would you mind meld with Bones first?

Only if he treats me to dinner and a show.

 

[JohnnyHopkins]

I would be more than happy to put any of you in danger to prevent that same meltdown, even if the only potential victim was a sandwich. Without hesitation! :