I don’t need to see him peak to know what his overall upside is.
He’s limited.. He can be a very good player. I just don’t see a guy you can pay a ton of money to and hope that he elevates the rest of the team.
He’s always going to need a lot and it’s going to be hard to build a powerhouse around that contract.
If you put a lot of guys in an optimal situation like Dallas they will play well.. Tannehill is one of those guys.
Just like the Chargers didn't need to see Brees peak and the entire NFL didn't need to see Brady peak to know he wasn't worth drafting?
What about Tannehill? You are contradicting yourself by going with 31 year old Tannehill as the standard rather then a younger Tannehill. Obviously this past year he played above what would have been considered his ceiling. The difference is, this season was an anomaly for him, while evidence shows Dak is still growing into his role.
End of the day, all we are talking about is opinions. Both you and me. But I am armed with evidence that NFL QBs cannot be judged to have proven their peak after year 4, and you are simply going with your personal perception. I think if the perception of NFL teams is shown to be less than completely reliable, the perception of fans sitting at home have to be considered much less reliable.