All Day Game Thread!

bigE79

bigE79

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,782
Reaction score
8,325
Go bucs!!! I'd take brady at 40+ over any the of qbs playIng today...easy.
 
HungryLion

HungryLion

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,745
Reaction score
60,821
jazzcat22 said:
Can't always go by the 1st few series. Sometimes a defense or offense may deviate from the norm, and it takes a few series to adjust.
I am saying this in general.
Has nothing to do with the way our defense is playing.
Click to expand...


Sure. The point is. Our defense sucks even without the turnover issue. They are historically bad so far.

I created threads about the turnover issue weeks ago. But let’s not pretend that the points given up are just from turnovers. The defense sucks.
 
AsthmaField

AsthmaField

Outta bounds
Messages
26,338
Reaction score
44,012
DakPresgoat said:
Sure. The point is. Our defense sucks even without the turnover issue. They are historically bad so far.

I created threads about the turnover issue weeks ago. But let’s not pretend that the points given up are just from turnovers. The defense sucks.
Click to expand...
It does suck.

It will improve as they get more playing time in the scheme and get hurt guys back, but the question is how much will they improve? Will it be enough, given the change at QB for Dallas?

We don’t know yet but they improved some last week, but that was against a poor offense.

We just have to wait and find out.
 
blueblood70

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,779
Reaction score
27,028
DakPresgoat said:
Of course they do. But the defense being historically bad is a major problem. Your first post made it sound like it’s all the turnovers or ST which is nonsense.

the defense is historically bad. If they don’t improve. The team is going nowhere period. Even if the offense coughs the ball up less.


The defense also needs to actually FORCE turnovers too. They could be like the bucs defense too.


Btw the term is “drivel” not dribble. If you’re going to mock somebody’s points, you may want to use actual proper terms to do so.
Click to expand...
my POINT for the last time is they would be simply Bad not historically bad IF the TOs and mistakes all over the field from many players and coaches for that matter piled it on..so instead of bad they appear historically bad and its not true... ive said of course i see the defense is playing poorly but i see a win or even 2 without the 11 phreaking lead leading TOs , ST gaff's, and poor coaching n decsions..3-2 ,4-1 would have bene more possible without the TOs and other miscues..

the 2-3 is team issue..not squarely on the defesne
 
HungryLion

HungryLion

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,745
Reaction score
60,821
blueblood70 said:
my POINT for the last time is they would be simply Bad not historically bad IF the TOs and mistakes all over the field from many players and coaches for that matter piled it on..so instead of bad they appear historically bad and its not true... ive said of course i see the defense is playing poorly but i see a win or even 2 without the 11 phreaking lead leading TOs , ST gaff's, and poor coaching n decsions..3-2 ,4-1 would have bene more possible without the TOs and other miscues..

the 2-3 is team issue..not squarely on the defesne
Click to expand...


So instead of being historically bad, they would just be like. Bottom 5 in the league.


Great point. Thanks


They are welcome to force turnovers themselves too at any point.
 
jazzcat22

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
77,451
Reaction score
96,191
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Grounding.

But the GB refs call a roughing, to offset. Saves the play.

No, after that replay it was late, though a chip. Freaking NFL rules.
 
RustyBourneHorse

RustyBourneHorse

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,751
Reaction score
42,587
Almost another pick. Amazing what can happen when you pressure a QB. Are you paying attention Nolan?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top