If Tankers had their way every team not going to playoffs would be intentionally throwing games for higher draft picks. Lol
Remove the word "tank" from all the discussions.
Replace it with just losing 2 to 4 years and subsequently picking high.
Think of Vermeil's Rams and how several years of losing and drafting high netted them HOFs Pace and Holt to go along with free agents Warner and Faulk.
Think of the same Rams on a lesser successsful scale getting Donald Gurley and Goff and their subsequent SB appearance soon afterward.
Similar to San Francisco's run of losing seasons netted them several high d line picks and a SB appearance. Washington kinda copied that without the post season success so far.
So if the whole hang up is on the word "tank" as an intentional motivation of the team to lose then these are several examples of benefiting from losing a few years in a row and capitalizing on those corresponding high picks without necessarily tanking.
Suck for Luck was an obvious tank job.
The Patriots minus this year and about 5 other well coached and well Gm'd teams have managed consistent playoffs over the past decade.
Dallas is not coached or Gm'd well. They need all the help they can get.
Whether you want to call it intentional or "tank" is irrelevant.
The point is that picking higher available ranked players 3 or 4 years in a row after losing can build a possible short to long term contender in "most" cases.