Video: If we do draft offense in Round 1

[J12B]

If we're picking 11th or later, I'd be happy with this guy.

Know we need defense but everything I've seen of Pitts is phenomenal.

 

[BrAinPaiNt]

I don't think they would take him but I imagine he would be the BPA if he fell to us (if we are outside the top 10)
They did it with CeeDee last year but I doubt it happens this year. I think they still like Jarwin a good deal and I think they probably have been impressed with Dalton this year.

Personally, at this time, I think the players that will be in our range and will be slotted right for the spot will be either CBs or OT/OG.

I don't think there is a top in top or middle of the first DT and frankly none of the DEs really tickle my fancy in the same area this year.

As much as I think they want to get a CB...I think if Slater falls to them they might take him. I think they know T.Smith's time is numbered and I have to wonder the extent of L.Collins injury.

With all of that said...Pitts is a stud and probably would be the BPA if he fell to us.

 

[J12B]

I agree CB should be the pick. Hopefully a solid DT or DE can be signed in FA. That would really help out the defense.

But Pitts looks so good already, he would be hard to pass on him if he's available.[/QUOTE]

 

[Sydla]

If we go O in the first round, it had better be on an OT.

 

[darthseinfeld]

Pitts will probably go top 10

 

[Future]

Pitts is a great player, but doesn't give Dallas anything they don't already have.

 

[kskboys]

If we're picking 11th or later, I'd be happy with this guy.

Know we need defense but everything I've seen of Pitts is phenomenal.

Here, let me finish that for you: .....then we are officially the dumbest team in the NFL.

 

[kskboys]

I don't think they would take him but I imagine he would be the BPA if he fell to us (if we are outside the top 10)
They did it with CeeDee last year but I doubt it happens this year. I think they still like Jarwin a good deal and I think they probably have been impressed with Dalton this year.

Personally, at this time, I think the players that will be in our range and will be slotted right for the spot will be either CBs or OT/OG.

I don't think there is a top in top or middle of the first DT and frankly none of the DEs really tickle my fancy in the same area this year.

As much as I think they want to get a CB...I think if Slater falls to them they might take him. I think they know T.Smith's time is numbered and I have to wonder the extent of L.Collins injury.

With all of that said...Pitts is a stud and probably would be the BPA if he fell to us.

And then a WR in the 2nd, so we can be 8-8 again!!!!!!!!!!!! Man, I'm starting to get on board w/ this BPA stuff!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[J12B]

Here, let me finish that for you: .....then we are officially the dumbest team in the NFL.

Not necessarily.

We don't want to reach on any players and if all our top defensive players are off the board and Pitts is there. I think we have to take him.

But I agree, defense has to be the top priority. Particularly CB or DL.

 

[Hardline]

Pitts is a great player, but doesn't give Dallas anything they don't already have.

Does Dallas have a Gronk or a Kelce?

 

[Future]

Does Dallas have a Gronk or a Kelce?

No, but they have guys who do all the same things. They don't need one.

 

[Cowboyny]

If we're picking 11th or later, I'd be happy with this guy.

Know we need defense but everything I've seen of Pitts is phenomenal.

This team has been bad in the red zone for several years, adding a player like Pitts helps that in a big way. If he’s on the board, it’s going to be awfully difficult to not take him.

 

[J12B]

This team has been bad in the red zone for several years, adding a player like Pitts helps that in a big way. If he’s on the board, it’s going to be awfully difficult to not take him.

Yes sirrr

 

[Hardline]

No, but they have guys who do all the same things. They don't need one.

No, but they have guys who do all the same things. They don't need one.

We don't have a Gronk or Kelce. Those guys are elite.

 

[Cowboyny]

Yes sirrr

I think the Eagles could be his landing spot as they like to use those double te’s within their offense. Ertz might leave due to contract demands

 

[Future]

We don't have a Gronk or Kelce. Those guys are elite.

I know. We don't need them, because we have guys who do all the things they do, like I said. Pitts doesn't give Dallas a new matchup advantage it doesn't already have, and neither would either of those guys.

 

[Future]

I think the Eagles could be his landing spot as they like to use those double te’s within their offense. Ertz might leave due to contract demands

Ertz also stinks now.

Philly would love Pitts. There really aren't many offenses that wouldn't lol.

 

[Hardline]

I know. We don't need them, because we have guys who do all the things they do, like I said. Pitts doesn't give Dallas a new matchup advantage it doesn't already have, and neither would either of those guys.

Gronk and Kelce are matchup nightmares. It would give a huge advantage.

 

[Future]

Gronk and Kelce are matchup nightmares. It would give a huge advantage.

Correct. They don't make matchups that Dallas doesn't already have.

I don't know what's complicated with this.

 

[Cowboyny]

Ertz also stinks now.

Philly would love Pitts. There really aren't many offenses that wouldn't lol.

They need to add more juice to their aging offense, he fits the bill.