Newest Mock with no trades

[CowboyDAK]

10. Pitts TE Florida
44. Ronnie Perkins Edge OU
75. Tyson Campbell CB Georgia
99. D’Ante Smith OT ECU
115. Chaz Surrat LB UNC
138. Adetokunbo Ogundeji DT Notre Dame
178. Tre Brown CB OU
191. Malcomb Koonce EDGE Buffalo
225. Jamar Johnson S Indiana
236. Josh Ball OT Marshall

I like this draft, we get our new offensive toy, possibly 3 rotation pieces on the defensive front, another corner, and some offensive line help for the future...

 

[fansince68]

10. Pitts TE Florida
44. Ronnie Perkins Edge OU
75. Tyson Campbell CB Georgia
99. D’Ante Smith OT ECU
115. Chaz Surrat LB UNC
138. Adetokunbo Ogundeji DT Notre Dame
178. Tre Brown CB OU
191. Malcomb Koonce EDGE Buffalo
225. Jamar Johnson S Indiana
236. Josh Ball OT Marshall

I like this draft, we get our new offensive toy, possibly 3 rotation pieces on the defensive front, another corner, and some offensive line help for the future...

I can see this if they trade Gallup for a 2nd rounder or higher.

 

[CowboyDAK]

I can see this if they trade Gallup for a 2nd rounder or higher.

If we trade Gallup for a second, I would think we could grab another starting quality CB or DT as well.

 

[blueblood70]

10. Pitts TE Florida
44. Ronnie Perkins Edge OU
75. Tyson Campbell CB Georgia
99. D’Ante Smith OT ECU
115. Chaz Surrat LB UNC
138. Adetokunbo Ogundeji DT Notre Dame
178. Tre Brown CB OU
191. Malcomb Koonce EDGE Buffalo
225. Jamar Johnson S Indiana
236. Josh Ball OT Marshall

I like this draft, we get our new offensive toy, possibly 3 rotation pieces on the defensive front, another corner, and some offensive line help for the future...

Toys? you mean the 3 Wrs that came close to getting 1k each in down year , those weapons' arent used? pollard used a lot more last year etc etc shultz got some balls, Dak can spread it around but agree we have far too many weapons on that side of the ball and taking an offensive player at that pick is a mistake IMHO..

best option if someone wants guy at 10 and ours can be hard few spots down, trade the spot and pick up another pick.

no TY im in on trade down or take BPA on Defense no cute picks..

 

[visionary]

Absolutely hate it

No DT beef
No FS

major fail IMO

 

[CowboyDAK]

Toys? you mean the 3 Wrs that came close to getting 1k each in down year , those weapons' arent used? pollard used a lot more last year etc etc shultz got some balls, Dak can spread it around but agree we have far too many weapons on that side of the ball and taking an offensive player at that pick is a mistake IMHO..

best option if someone wants guy at 10 and ours can be hard few spots down, trade the spot and pick up another pick.

no TY im in on trade down or take BPA on Defense no cute picks..

I agree but you know Jerry will take Pitts if he’s available

 

[805BoysInBlue]

This would be a nightmare draft, and not in a good way.

 

[Hardline]

I agree but you know Jerry will take Pitts if he’s available

He would be a moron for not taking Pitts.
Give me Pitts and you can have whatever you want from there on out.
I got my superstar TE/WR. Now go build that defense.

 

[Hardline]

I agree but you know Jerry will take Pitts if he’s available

Pitts has moved up the draft and is out of our range now.

 

[America's Cowboy]

F

 

[Future]

I don't really like some of these players - Perkins, Surratt especially - but I like the thought around it.