Jeff Legwold’s Top 100

Wilson at 24 should raise a few eyebrows.
He sure love Devonta Smith...whoa. 3rd best prospect.
But it's his ranking
 
reddyuta said:
I don't get the fascination with Paye and Rossau.
Click to expand...
Rousseau is interesting in that he has alotnof versatility. He just isnt gonna play RDE. Alot of production without much of a pass rush arsenal. Could be a Calais Campbell type player. He isnt gonna go as high as some initially project.

Paye is a bit of a wildcard. Very talent and plays hard, but not a lot of production. May have been moved around too much. People here are scared of Michigan DE's because of Taco, but Paye is the anti Taco. Where Rousseau may wind up being a good value pick for someone, Paye might go higher than he should
 
He's just throwing out shock value to be different than the crowd. His top 10 alone is a joke.
 
Hardline said:
He's just throwing out shock value to be different than the crowd. His top 10 alone is a joke.
Click to expand...

It’s ok to have differing opinions. What part of his top 10 a “joke” to you? Devonta Smith is bit high for me, but most have him as a top 10-12 prospect regardless. Other than Smith I don’t see any other real controversial opinions
 
tm1119 said:
It’s ok to have differing opinions. What part of his top 10 a “joke” to you? Devonta Smith is bit high for me, but most have him as a top 10-12 prospect regardless. Other than Smith I don’t see any other real controversial opinions
Click to expand...
Slater at 5 and Sewell at 8
Paye at 10
 
tm1119 said:
It’s ok to have differing opinions. What part of his top 10 a “joke” to you? Devonta Smith is bit high for me, but most have him as a top 10-12 prospect regardless. Other than Smith I don’t see any other real controversial opinions
Click to expand...

Slater at 5 seems like a reach. I think Slater could end up being the most disappointing of the first round OL.
 
Sydla said:
Slater at 5 seems like a reach. I think Slater could end up being the most disappointing of the first round OL.
Click to expand...

Im not even disagreeing. I’m just saying 1. It’s always good to see different perspectives and 2. Slater is a stud by all accounts, I don’t see how someone ranking him slightly ahead of Sewell deems the entire rankings as click bait as the other poster suggested
 
tm1119 said:
Im not even disagreeing. I’m just saying 1. It’s always good to see different perspectives and 2. Slater is a stud by all accounts, I don’t see how someone ranking him slightly ahead of Sewell deems the entire rankings as click bait as the other poster suggested
Click to expand...
Slater is a very good prospect. Personally, I wouldn’t put him in front of Sewell, but this guy isn’t the only person putting Slater first.

I see them both as very good players.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 46 more.
Total: 2,743 (members: 146, guests: 2,597)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,963
Messages
13,907,305
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top