News: ESPN Analyst Has Blunt Message For Dak Prescott, Cowboys

[TwoCentPlain]

Look, I've said this 100 times.
Dak will be as good as the system he's in.
He not nor ever will be a pure pocket passer. He excels out of the oocket. Doesn't mean every play but at least 4 of 10 attempts. Linehan developed the ultimate offense for Dak in 2016 just expand on that and let it rip. Keep Dak in the pocket and he will be much less effective.
Hoping for the best. Obviously

I believe the powers that be have said Dak will be running less and in the pocket more. You don’t want your $160M investment to get hurt, right?

Do you think Moore will call any QB runs? Will Moore have Dak running the run-pass option and risk getting hit?

 

[75boyz]

Bingo.

They think we want Dak to fail. I don't want Dak to fail because he is the QB for my team, but I refuse to crown him like they already have.

If you believe anything other then Dak is a top 5 QB then you are a "hater" or "troll".

Yep, exactly. Never will understand the lack of accountability given here towards wins/losses by the starting QB and this extreme bias of player over team concept.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Yep, exactly. Never will understand the lack of accountability given here towards wins/losses by the starting QB and this extreme bias of player over team concept.

There's def. people that are 100% fine with a loss as long as Dak has pretty numbers they can throw around.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

I bet the loses sting less for you as long as Dak puts up some empty stats, don't they? Don't fib.

What? That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard that must be how you think to even suggest such a thing. If the Cowboys W and Dak plays poorly it makes your day? That' sick man lol.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

There's def. people that are 100% fine with a loss as long as Dak has pretty numbers they can throw around.

This is a myth you created in your head to justify your baseless opinion.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Yep, exactly. Never will understand the lack of accountability given here towards wins/losses by the starting QB and this extreme bias of player over team concept.

People hold Dak accountable but at some point common sense and football IQ has to come into play when criticizing him and for whatever reason you have fans who just simply can't grasp that. They aren't capable.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

What? That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard that must be how you think to even suggest such a thing. If the Cowboys W and Dak plays poorly it makes your day? That' sick man lol.

A Dallas win always makes my day. I don't care how Dak plays, if Dak plays, or if Dak ever plays again as long as we win.

That what separates me from you.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

This is a myth you created in your head to justify your baseless opinion.

Like a month to flame...

 

[TwoCentPlain]

Redzone issues is the predictability and stubborness to try to punch it in with Zeke every time. Zeke and the oline simply get beat more often then not. I agree that Moore does it too much.

Dak is free to audible. Dak audibles. The actual play ran is the responsibility of the QB.

Dak is talking to the OC via the headset. Dak can tell Moore what he sees and wants. Dak has the most input on the actual play ran. Dak ultimately chooses the play.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

All these trolls have to do to stop us from defending Dak is to stop saying stupid things. Its THAT simple.

"Dak is average".................you are going to get people to call you out on that every time. They are going to make you look dumb.

Heck if someone said that Dak was elite, I would say that he wasnt.

Exactly. I've addressed that crap Dak Attack does I think its insane. If you say something as stupid as "Dak is average" expect for someone to respond....but they know that. They like the attention which is why they do it in the first place.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

A Dallas win always makes my day. I don't care how Dak plays, if Dak plays, or if Dak ever plays again as long as we win.

That what separates me from you.

Like I said, I've been on this site for years....I've seen Romo lovers/Dak lovers or whatever...I've NEVER seen anyone brag about Dak having a good game in a loss. I know you're game. You create all these baseless opinions based on what ONE poster on this site does who's clearly trolling and you make him the poster child for "Dak fans".

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Like I said, I've been on this site for years....I've seen Romo lovers/Dak lovers or whatever...I've NEVER seen anyone brag about Dak having a good game in a loss. I know you're game. You create all these baseless opinions based on what ONE poster on this site does who's clearly trolling and you make him the poster child for "Dak fans".

Why would I care how Dak plays as long as the Cowboys win the game?

Did you not post specifically post Daks stats yesterday in the 3 games we lost against playoff teams last year? You were literally trying to pump Dak up for his numbers in those loses and now you're saying. "I've NEVER seen anyone brag about Dak having a good game in a loss"

You literally proving my point that you are more concerned with how Dak plays then you are if the Cowboys win the game or not.

 

[75boyz]

Dak is free to audible. Dak audibles. The actual play ran is the responsibility of the QB.

Dak is talking to the OC via the headset. Dak can tell Moore what he sees and wants. Dak has the most input on the actual play ran. Dak ultimately chooses the play.

Yep, either a foreign concept to many or one in which they choose to ignore depending upon personal agenda.
We could go even further fundamentally and discuss the importance of QB footwork, pocket presence or reading defenses.
I would be kinda scared to do that though because of the so many expert unemployed Bill Walsh's and Norv Turners found here responding to how Prescott excels at these ongoing deficiencies.
Kinda like all the pseudo-defensive coordinator types here disputing over the 4-3 and 3-4 alignments and why their opinion is more right than yours.

Lol, but alas, Go Cowboys

 

[TwoCentPlain]

Redzone issues is the predictability and stubborness to try to punch it in with Zeke every time. Zeke and the oline simply get beat more often then not. I agree that Moore does it too much.

Dak is the one who hands the ball to his BFF Elliott. Dak has audible capability. Dak choose which play is actually ran. Dak has input with OC and discusses the play.

 

[CowboyRoy]

I bet the loses sting less for you as long as Dak puts up some empty stats, don't they? Don't fib.

Im pretty realistic about our chances of winning or not. Some of these homers think we are going 14-3 so they get shocked when we lose 3 in a row. Losses are loses, but when Dak plays well at least I can come make fun of trolls like you. Thats about it.

Im a Zeke troll so when he plays well I usually hear about it. And thats fine. Unlike you I usually say he had a good game and thats that. Unlike you I dont argue that Zeke was the reason we lost when he goes for 150 yards and 2 TD's.

 

[CowboyRoy]

Dak is free to audible. Dak audibles. The actual play ran is the responsibility of the QB.

Dak is talking to the OC via the headset. Dak can tell Moore what he sees and wants. Dak has the most input on the actual play ran. Dak ultimately chooses the play.

Yah, this same argument was brought up with Romo. Dak cant choose which RB comes into the game. He also cant make Zeke bounce it outside or NOT run into his lineman.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Why would I care how Dak plays as long as the Cowboys win the game?

Did you not post specifically post Daks stats yesterday in the 3 games we lost against playoff teams last year? You were literally trying to pump Dak up for his numbers in those loses and now you're saying. "I've NEVER seen anyone brag about Dak having a good game in a loss"

You literally proving my point that you are more concerned with how Dak plays then you are if the Cowboys win the game or not.

If your reading comprehension skills lead you to believe I was "pumping" up Dak then so be it. But what I was doing was refuting the claim that Dak was why we lost those games.

 

[CowboyRoy]

I'm not like you, Roy...

You're perfectly fine with a Cowboys loss as long as Dak puts up empty stats.

Winning makes you look dumb. Double bonus for me.

Its the losses that you cheer for. Your dream game is the Cowboys losing and Dak throwing lots of picks. Thats why we call you a troll!

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

If your reading comprehension skills lead you to believe I was "pumping" up Dak then so be it. But what I was doing was refuting the claim that Dak was why we lost those games.

We all believe you didn't post Daks stats to try and make him look good in those losses. I mean, you just said you wouldn't do something like that and all.....

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Winning makes you look dumb. Double bonus for me.

Its the losses that you cheer for. Your dream game is the Cowboys losing and Dak throwing lots of picks. Thats why we call you a troll!

You call me a troll because I'm more of a fan of the team then I am of the player.