New England, a game for the coaches

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,137
Reaction score
10,115
I know enough to not be stuck in the 1960s.


So then list it..then list what BB brought...its gonna be funny to break down how BB would actually tell YOU he uses Landry concepts in todays NFL with changes...but keep looking "non Delusional" by saying Landry couldnt be on the same sideline...this should be fun. Do you ever notice no one else has a big red nose but keep talking about the guy with one?
 

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,774
Reaction score
63,517
So then list it..then list what BB brought...its gonna be funny to break down how BB would actually tell YOU he uses Landry concepts in todays NFL with changes...but keep looking :non Delusional" by saying Landry couldnt be on the sam sideline...this should be fun. Do you ever notice no one else has a big red nose but keep talking about the guy with one?
BB can use whatever he wants. He'd be a fool not to use the tools that was left for him.

BB used what he had learned from other guys and became better than them. That's how things evolve.

Join us now in the present time, will ya?
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,137
Reaction score
10,115
BB can use whatever he wants. He'd be a fool not to use the tools that was left for him.

BB used what he had learned from other guys and became better than them. That's how things evolve.

Join us now in the present time, will ya?


So i9n other words no... you dont know anything about it...ok ..maybe youll tell me how its a passing league now and Landry would not know how to defense that....
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,137
Reaction score
10,115
You're wasting your time, brother.

I can't take someone as delusional as you very seriously. You're stuck in the 60s.


Lol your the one that said Landry is nothing...you are serious though thats the issue..again tell me what you know.
 

DallasInDC

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,792
Reaction score
4,572
Well I've always been reluctant to call him the GOAT when he's only ever been able to win with the greatest QB. His GOAT status is very much in question with me.

But there is no question that he's one of the great coaches. You have to at least give him that.

I do find it funny that everyone is worried about what Belichick will throw at us, yet, I look at their record and who they played. I mean really, they beat the (1-3) Jets and the (1-3) Texans???? They lost to the (0-4) Dolphins, (2-2) Saints and the bucs (personal grudge match)????

What is remotely impressive about that. If Belichick is that impactful I would have expected him to be at least 4-1 playing against these scrub teams.
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,137
Reaction score
10,115
I do find it funny that everyone is worried about what Belichick will throw at us, yet, I look at their record and who they played. I mean really, they beat the (1-3) Jets and the (1-3) Texans???? They lost to the (0-4) Dolphins, (2-2) Saints and the bucs (personal grudge match)????

What is remotely impressive about that. If Belichick is that impactful I would have expected him to be at least 4-1 playing against these scrub teams.


Right...Its funny the TEXANS took him to the wire and they have a worse roster yet the genius will cover our offense???
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,137
Reaction score
10,115
Rent free


Rent free and refusing to pay because you think its ok...2 diferent things. Youre not rent free in anyones head you just refuse to answer questions that you have no idea what the answer to is....its not rent free its called the internet. Some can admit when they are wrong and some cant ....you did on Dak I gave you credit..your takes on Landry and #12 come from a position of uninformed...you could just say that.
 

Bullflop

Cowboys Diehard
Messages
24,706
Reaction score
30,032
Thank you for schooling

Actually, as it turned out myself and the Mighty Van Halen were referring to two different Toms, so we both were misunderstanding the other. While I was referring to Tom Landry, he was referring to Tom Brady. It was merely a misunderstanding of Biblical proportions, LOL. We just proved for sure that we're simply human beings and prone to human error.

We each apologized to one another and that was about it. I surely didn't mean to instigate a feud, so, again, my apologies for my part in the misunderstanding. It seems like the history of the Cowboys and the modern day concepts don't exactly coincide with one another. That's OK, though.

Anyhow, I hope we can all respect one another as Cowboys fans and be glad for being fans of such a promising team in 2021. This version of the Dallas Cowboys can use all the support we can manage. I know yesterday's teams brings fond memories to those of us who watched them and we're fortunate to still be watching them today.

Thanks to the younger patrons who support them, as well and may you all, again, be blessed with the great success of those champions of the past. :)
 

Whirlwin

Cowboy , It’s a way of life.
Messages
23,977
Reaction score
16,255
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Actually, as it turned out myself and the Mighty Van Halen were referring to two different Toms, so we both were misunderstanding the other. While I was referring to Tom Landry, he was referring to Tom Brady. It was merely a misunderstanding of Biblical proportions, LOL.

We each apologized to one another and that was about it. I surely didn't mean to instigate a feud, so, again, my apologies for my part in the misunderstanding. It seems like the history of the Cowboys and the modern day concepts don't exactly coincide with one another. That's OK, though.

Anyhow, I hope we can all respect one another as Cowboys fans and be glad for being fans of such a promising team in 2021. This version of the Dallas Cowboys can use all the support we can manage. I know yesterday's teams brings fond memories to those of us who watched them and we're fortunate to still be watching them today.

Thanks to the younger patrons who support them, as well and may you all, again, be blessed with the great success of those champions of the past. :)
Yes
 

Whirlwin

Cowboy , It’s a way of life.
Messages
23,977
Reaction score
16,255
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Here's where I'm coming from.

If they were to have a draft right now i'm taking Aikman, Romo, AND Dak before Staubach any day of the week.

That's has nothing to do with legacy. That has to do with how the game has evolved since the 1960s. The game is MUCH different now. The rules, the size of guys, medicine, and training are completely different than the 1960s.

If Staubach had the same benefits that the other guys had then maybe things would be different, but he didn't, so we can pretend that did.

If we're going legacy then it would be Aikman, Staubach, Romo, and Dak for me.
And knowing what you know. You would take Romo before Roger . I guess that says it all
 

Whirlwin

Cowboy , It’s a way of life.
Messages
23,977
Reaction score
16,255
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Here's where I'm coming from.

If they were to have a draft right now i'm taking Aikman, Romo, AND Dak before Staubach any day of the week.

That's has nothing to do with legacy. That has to do with how the game has evolved since the 1960s. The game is MUCH different now. The rules, the size of guys, medicine, and training are completely different than the 1960s.

If Staubach had the same benefits that the other guys had then maybe things would be different, but he didn't, so we can pretend that did.

If we're going legacy then it would be Aikman, Staubach, Romo, and Dak for me.
You’re right. Roger Staubach didn’t have the benefits of the people today. Yet he still played and was a champion. Imagine if he had the benefits.
 
Top