When Dak scores more than Rodgers vs SF

[RaZon]

And yet, here you are!

This thread was about comparing two games.

Why would anyone do that, what difference does it make in the grand scheme of anything? So Jimmy G is better than both Dak and Rodgers, no he isn't.

 

[CowboyFrog]

Aaron Rodgers is too decorated to be in any discussion vs Dak, just that simple. Rodgers an all time great.

Rodgers has won the same amount of SB as Trent Dilfer...and the best running game and defense he ever had was the year he won...I dont care if he is better or worse than Dak he spit the bit the same as Dak did in these playoffs..to say anything else is just ridiculous.

 

[TheHerd]

Dont get me wrong Im tired of these core players shrinking in big games including Dak..but anyone in here defending Rodgers for that game while saying Dak suck is a hypocrite of the highest order.

This board is full of hypocrites and people who don’t understand football is a team game

 

[RaZon]

Rodgers has won the same amount of SB as Trent Dilfer...and the best running game and defense he ever had was the year he won...I dont care if he is better or worse than Dak he spit the bit the same as Dak did in these playoffs..to say anything else is just ridiculous.

Ridiculous is talking Dak vs Rodgers at all, what is the goal there? Jimmy G beat both so he's better, hell no.

 

[CowboyFrog]

Ridiculous is talking Dak vs Rodgers at all, what is the goal there? Jimmy G beat both so he's better, hell no.

no ridiculous is comming here and blaming the ST for the lose when Rodger put up 10 points and his defense only allowed 6...its also ridiculous to act as if Rodgers does not need a good team to win..and its done all the time on this forum..if you dont see that then I cant help you..again I dont care who is better they are bot at home and they both could not score enough points to beat the 9er's. There are MANY on here who will say everyday "Stats dont matter" just winning...the facts are the only "Win " Rodgers ever had was with a top ranked run game and defense. those are facts do with them what you want.

 

[RaZon]

no ridiculous is comming here and blaming the ST for the lose when Rodger put up 10 points and his defense only allowed 6...its also ridiculous to act as if Rodgers does not need a good team to win..and its done all the time on this forum..if you dont see that then I cant help you..again I dont care who is better they are bot at home and they both could not score enough points to beat the 9er's. There are MANY on here who will say everyday "Stats dont matter" just winning...the facts are the only "Win " Rodgers ever had was with a top ranked run game and defense. those are facts do with them what you want.

None of that matters, bottom line is Aaron Rodgers is on a whole other level of QB than Dak is, so why even talk one game at all?

Put Rodgers on Dallas and how do ya think they would do?

 

[TheHerd]

what’s embarrassing and whose actually trying too hard is posters like you who are trying to insinuate that anyone is saying dak is a top 5 qb. What people are saying is that it’s more than just about dak.

Jimmy g just beat the packers because his niners could run the ball, pressure the quarterback & protect him. 3 basics of fundamental football. The packers with home field advantage, an all time great and league mvp quarterback in Rodgers s with the number 1 seed- couldn’t protect Rodgers, failed at special teams and couldn’t win the game.

if an inferior quarterback like Jimmy can beat Rodgers in lambeau then the cowboys are fine with dak as long as they can defend, protect dak & run the ball

You forgot to mention the niners special teams scored more points than their offense. But it’s all about how great Jimmy G is.

 

[CTcowboy203]

You forgot to mention the niners special teams scored more points than their offense. But it’s all about how great Jimmy G is.

actually it isn’t. The point went right over your head so I’ll spell it out for you.....the point is that if a team like the niners can over come bad quarterback play from Jimmy g by running the ball, pressuring the quarterback and not committing penalties - then the cowboys certainty have a blueprint for those that say dak sucks.

Jimmy is clearly inferior to dak. The whole point was that Jimmy sucks not how good he was and that dak is more than capable as long as we can play fundamentally sound football.

 

[CowboyFrog]

None of that matters, bottom line is Aaron Rodgers is on a whole other level of QB than Dak is, so why even talk one game at all?

Put Rodgers on Dallas and how do ya think they would do?

If they cant run the ball or stop the run they lose just like they did last night on the best team in the NFC..what now GB was not the Best team in the NFC...again why is that now..we are better than they are?

 

[ESisback]

Why would anyone do that, what difference does it make in the grand scheme of anything? So Jimmy G is better than both Dak and Rodgers, no he isn't.

No one said that except you.

 

[ghst187]

Jimmy G is elite. I heard it here.

So elite they traded up for another QB and likely plan to ditch him after this season…

 

[TheHerd]

actually it isn’t. The point went right over your head so I’ll spell it out for you.....the point is that if a team like the niners can over come bad quarterback play from Jimmy g by running the ball, pressuring the quarterback and not committing penalties - then the cowboys certainty have a blueprint for those that say dak sucks.

Jimmy is clearly inferior to dak. The whole point was that Jimmy sucks not how good he was and that dak is more than capable as long as we can play fundamentally sound football.

Easy Duke. I get all that. And we totally agree. Football is a team sport and overall sound play and good coaching makes a big difference.

I just sick of so many claiming the only thing that matters is the QB and no matter how well or badly the QB plays, the win is because the QB won it and if they lose it’s because the QB is trash.

 

[RaZon]

No one said that except you.

Missed the point, what difference does a playoff game make, yep it doesn't. No Jimmy G isn't better because he beat Dak and Rodgers, let me guess ya don't get it.

 

[CTcowboy203]

Easy Duke. I get all that. And we totally agree. Football is a team sport and overall sound play and good coaching makes a big difference.

I just sick of so many claiming the only thing that matters is the QB and no matter how well or badly the QB plays, the win is because the QB won it and if they lose it’s because the QB is trash.

haha I hear ya and I agree buddy. Lol.

 

[ESisback]

Missed the point, what difference does a playoff game make, yep it doesn't. No Jimmy G isn't better because he beat Dak and Rodgers, let me guess ya don't get it.

Never said Jimmy G was better. Never even implied it, and no, I must not get your point. Does anyone?

 

[morat1959]

Discuss.

(Cue the “our OL is elite” comments)

I know this is a joke?????

 

[MajesticRey]

I know this is a joke?????

People have said our OL is good. Not a joke.

 

[Jimbo69]

Hilarious thread. Unbelievable what people here are saying. Rodgers is a SB winner, first ballot HOF. Dak is 1-4 against Rodgers. We play the Packers next year, if Rodgers is there you will get good odds, put your money down( I put my money down on the Boys each year ).

 

[darthseinfeld]

Even if your discounting weather, Rodgers had a bad game. With Dak, it was more of his norm VS good defenses the second if the season.

Dak needs to fix whatever happen the second of the season. Period

 

[remdak]

It's fun being a Cowboys fan. You get to compare your playoff losses to other teams.