Interesting Mosher stat on drafting a WR after pick 75

NFL grades them as plus starters (5), average starters (5), and good backups that could become starters (5).
 
stilltheguru said:
Who said we needed a pro bowl wr? Smh. Gallup was picked 81st and we just paid him so............
Click to expand...

Yea, I am wondering how he is defining quality. As you mentioned Gallup is certainly a quality receiver and he was picked 81st and Wilson was a 6th rounder and just had a nice pay day. I actually think he would have been just fine as our 3rd WR.
 
Kolemmitt said:
Yea, I am wondering how he is defining quality. As you mentioned Gallup is certainly a quality receiver and he was picked 81st and Wilson was a 6th rounder and just had a nice pay day. I actually think he would have been just fine as our 3rd WR.
Click to expand...
These Cowboy fans and writers begging for a wr in round 1/2 are weird to me. They keep moving goalposts. First it was you need a first rounder. Now it's top 75. Lol kupp was drafted 69. It's funny how these weirdos play with numbers.
 
Last edited:
stilltheguru said:
These Cowboy fans and writers begging for a wr in round 1/2 are weird to me. They keep moving goalposts. First it was you need a first rounder. Now it's top 75. Lol keep was drafted 69. It's funny how these weirdos play with numbers.
Click to expand...


Calm down dude (lol)......no one's suggesting anything. He simply posted a stat.......not saying who/what/when the Cowboys or any other teams should draft a WR but here are the odds, depending on what you are looking for.
 
Hawkeye0202 said:
Calm down dude (lol)......no one's suggesting anything. He simply posted a stat.......not saying who/what/when the Cowboys or any other teams should draft a WR but here are the odds, depending on what you are looking for.
Click to expand...
I'm calm. I just don't like sneaky stuff. And I don't trust any of these Cowboy media people.
 
i wont be surprised if our 1st two picks are offense,the draft may fall in a way that the best player remaining will be a Olineman and WR respectively.
 
reddyuta said:
i wont be surprised if our 1st two picks are offense,the draft may fall in a way that the best player remaining will be a Olineman and WR respectively.
Click to expand...

A bunch of recent mocks are all over the chart. Some are showing QBs moving up and WRs down. Hell, I saw one earlier this week where we pass on Edge rusher Johnson. One issue I think is getting overlooked is 8 teams having two 1st round picks. Meaning they can go BPA AND target priority positions.
 
In the last 5 years, after pick 75 we’ve drafted:
  • Semi Fehoko
  • Michael Gallup
  • Cedric Wilson
  • Noah Brown
  • Ryan Switzer
I would argue we’re batting at least .500 with picks after 75 when selecting a WR.
 
So he's defining "quality starting receiver" by 1000-yard seasons.

From 2011 through last year, there were on average 20-25 1000-yard receivers each season, fewer than one per team. In a league where 11 personnel is the standard, that's a really narrow definition of "quality starter."
 
stilltheguru said:
Who said we needed a pro bowl wr? Smh. Gallup was picked 81st and we just paid him so............
Click to expand...
Thats just it. We dont need a #1 guy. Or even a #2 guy. Unless there is something seriously weird about Lamb we don't know about, I dont see the point. Plus Lamb is under contract for 3 more year. Even his option year is well below market
 
JD_KaPow said:
So he's defining "quality starting receiver" by 1000-yard seasons.

From 2011 through last year, there were on average 20-25 1000-yard receivers each season, fewer than one per team. In a league where 11 personnel is the standard, that's a really narrow definition of "quality starter."
Click to expand...
Id say 800 is a decent guage for a #2
 
What about guys like Beasley? He was never 1,000 yard guy but he put up 833, 778 and 967. Those are the kinds of guys you’re looking for past 75. Not number 1’s
 
Kolemmitt said:
Yea, I am wondering how he is defining quality. As you mentioned Gallup is certainly a quality receiver and he was picked 81st and Wilson was a 6th rounder and just had a nice pay day. I actually think he would have been just fine as our 3rd WR.
Click to expand...

Agreed.

Mosher is known for pushing out info that seems profound but wilts under closer scrutiny.
 
Hawkeye0202 said:
FYI......75th pick round off the top 12 in round 3
https://www.nfl.com/news/2022-nfl-draft-order-for-all-seven-rounds





Click to expand...

Isn't this the guy that absolutely hated the Micah pick and still won't admit he was WRONG?

He's added to the list of opinions I no longer care for.

Mosher, Cowherd, Bayless, Stephen A. Smith, Dan Orlofsky. I'm fine with people getting it wrong but admit it. This group says stupid things and just doubles/triples down on them to try and be right. They are gas bag clowns.
 
stilltheguru said:
These Cowboy fans and writers begging for a wr in round 1/2 are weird to me. They keep moving goalposts. First it was you need a first rounder. Now it's top 75. Lol kupp was drafted 69. It's funny how these weirdos play with numbers.
Click to expand...
Mosher is usually wrong, but you’re bugging by downplaying our need at receiver.

You didnt want to bush Coop, but are ok with replacing him with a later rounder? :huh:


If Romo was the QB, i wouldnt be stressing taking a WR high. In his best season, he had Dez, Twill, Beasley, and Dwayne Harris as his top-4 receivers.

Dak had Coop, Ceedee, Gallup, and Ced and could only score 7 points through 3 quarters vs SF
 
Hawkeye0202 said:
A bunch of recent mocks are all over the chart. Some are showing QBs moving up and WRs down. Hell, I saw one earlier this week where we pass on Edge rusher Johnson. One issue I think is getting overlooked is 8 teams having two 1st round picks. Meaning they can go BPA AND target priority positions.
Click to expand...
We have no idea what the Cowboys will do in the first round and I love it.:laugh::omg::grin::huh:
 
I didn't want Coop gone but we didn't NEED him. We need this run game to get better
WillieBeamen said:
Mosher is usually wrong, but you’re bugging by downplaying our need at receiver.

You didnt want to bush Coop, but are ok with replacing him with a later rounder? :huh:


If Romo was the QB, i wouldnt be stressing taking a WR high. In his best season, he had Dez, Twill, Beasley, and Dwayne Harris as his top-4 receivers.

Dak had Coop, Ceedee, Gallup, and Ced and could only score 7 points through 3 quarters vs SF
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

Total: 706 (members: 34, guests: 672)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,498
Messages
13,879,091
Members
23,791
Latest member
mashburn
Back
Top