No, they were better than the 49ers on tonight.Does this mean the vikings are better than us?
I've seen that logic (if A beats B, and B beats C, then A must be better than C) used constantly in here (to prove we're better than this team or that team we haven't played)
Sure, but we're now tied in the loss column. So what that says to me is that it's just one game. They'll have the tie breaker but its way to early to know whether it will mean anything at all. Season turns on a dime.I wouldn't go too far with that, him and his team still beat us 42-10 4 TDs 0 INTs, what does that say about us.
It says we lost a game.I wouldn't go too far with that, him and his team still beat us 42-10 4 TDs 0 INTs, what does that say about us.
It says that we played poorly in an NFL game while they did not.I wouldn't go too far with that, him and his team still beat us 42-10 4 TDs 0 INTs, what does that say about us.
Cousins didnt do cousins things in the end of gameBest game I’ve ever seen cousins play
That Lance Trade looking goodThe past two weeks have revealed Purdy’s limitations. I don’t think those are sufficient to knock them out of SB contender status. They’ll adjust.
They missed a GW FG last week.Purdy with 2 4th quarter game losing drives back to back.
Oh.No, they were better than the 49ers on tonight.
you know why, we just can't talk about it in this threadWhy couldn't Dallas beat the 49ers?
They have lost the aura they had after they beat Dallas. People were talking about a potential undefeated season, and now they don't seem nearly as scary.Best game I’ve seen Cousins play. SF ain’t going anywhere. They are still tops in conference. Great game.