Dak on his legacy - I want to win a championship

OGSixshooter said:
Dak's team was missing their starting QB...and the backup was Kellen Moore. If you think propping Dak up as the reason for the restoration you need to look at 2014 when Romo was healthy. You use the same arguments to ignore 2024 and prop up "near-MVP" Dak.

A disingenuous point says more about the person proffering said point...not the argument itself.
Click to expand...
Never said he was a near MvP I said he was a All Pro and you said he was as a fill in because a All Pro didn’t want to be an all pro or some stupid point you was trying to make lol.

So you say Dak sucks. I say they were a 4 win team but you say because they were missing Romo. So shouldn’t they have won 4 games again with Dak? You’re contradicting yourself.
 
TheMarathonContinues said:
Never said he was a near MvP I said he was a All Pro and you said he was as a fill in because a All Pro didn’t want to be an all pro or some stupid point you was trying to make lol.

So you say Dak sucks. I say they were a 4 win team but you say because they were missing Romo. So shouldn’t they have won 4 games again with Dak? You’re contradicting yourself.
Click to expand...
Again...refer to how you argue earlier.

You seem to reflexively misstate the other person's position: 1) When did I say Dak was a "fill-in"? I said he was "2nd team all-pro" but I also said it's WORTHLESS because there are no awards or trophies or even recognition as an all-pro.

Perhaps a lesson in English and critical thinking will help here: Unlike the Pro-Bowl, All-Pro is the BEST REGARDLESS OF CONFERENCE. It's not meant to recognize pretty good players but ony the VERY BEST. Of "all the pro players", these are the best. For record-keeping purposes, they note the runner-ups...but by definition the award is only meant for...drumroll...the VERY BEST.

So when you deliberately keep conflating "all-pro" - THE VERY BEST NO EXCEPTIONS - with Dak's true designation, "the 2nd best", "1st loser" - no trophy, no reward designation...yeah...I'm here for it. :)
 
OGSixshooter said:
Again...refer to how you argue earlier.

You seem to reflexively misstate the other person's position: 1) When did I say Dak was a "fill-in"? I said he was "2nd team all-pro" but I also said it's WORTHLESS because there are no awards or trophies or even recognition as an all-pro.

Perhaps a lesson in English and critical thinking will help here: Unlike the Pro-Bowl, All-Pro is the BEST REGARDLESS OF CONFERENCE. It's not meant to recognize pretty good players but ony the VERY BEST. Of "all the pro players", these are the best. For record-keeping purposes, they note the runner-ups...but by definition the award is only meant for...drumroll...the VERY BEST.

So when you deliberately keep conflating "all-pro" - THE VERY BEST NO EXCEPTIONS - with Dak's true designation, "the 2nd best", "1st loser" - no trophy, no reward designation...yeah...I'm here for it. :)
Click to expand...
I don’t care if he made the 5th All pro team…:anyone would take the best player in their conference…unless you have an ulterior motive….
 
TheMarathonContinues said:
@OGSixshooter you’ve become a victim of his race bating . Congrats….
Click to expand...
No...that's actually this post. My arguments don't require it...in fact, that's why I deliberately juxtaposed Jayden Daniels. And if you notice, no one has tried to denigrate him.

So...swwiiing and a misss on that one. I do agree that happens on forums but THIS ain't THAT.
 
OGSixshooter said:
No...that's actually this post. My arguments don't require it...in fact, that's why I deliberately juxtaposed Jayden Daniels. And if you notice, no one has tried to denigrate him.

So...swwiiing and a misss on that one. I do agree that happens on forums but THIS ain't THAT.
Click to expand...
It for sure is that….hes trying to get me out of character like he always does by saying it’s only one reason I like Dak. It’s a tactic Zrinkill does to…..don’t let them play you for the fool they think you are. I’m just the messenger…
 
TheMarathonContinues said:
It for sure is that….hes trying to get me out of character like he always does by saying it’s only one reason I like Dak. It’s a tactic Zrinkill does to…..don’t let them play you for the fool they think you are. I’m just the messenger…
Click to expand...
I'm just a fiddle player. I don't know if @zrinkill plays the fiddle or not.
 
KJJ said:
You’re blaming a slick football for the fumble on the snap? lol That fumble cost us the game. Romo is best remembered for that play. One of his playoff INTs was when the game was on the line and he got picked in the endzone against the Giants. I’m not even counting all of the turnovers he had in the three season final finale elimination game losses that had a playoff spot on the line. Against Philly in 08 in the 44-6 debacle he had an INT and 2 lost fumbles.

Against the Giants in 2011 he had an INT and a lost fumble. Against Washington in 2012 he had 3 INTs. If you want to spend all day arguing about Romo vs Dak I’m not wasting my time with it so save yourself a lengthy response. They both had their issues in the playoffs, but the bottom line is neither one had a good enough team and defense to get it done.
Click to expand...
You’re an anti-Romoholic. You’re the one who brought up his greater amount interceptions to diminish him for Dak, forgetting that Romo is a much more accurate thrower who takes chances by throwing people open unlike Dak who plays more conservatively. I merely said he had less (braindead) interceptions than Dak has in the playoffs.

You then turned it into an effectively bash Romo post (brought up his fumbles) because you couldn’t take the fact that Dak has thrown more picks in the playoffs (seven) compared to Romo’s (two).

And the pick against the Giants was on the last play of the game with no time on the clock, i.e., it was a desperation heave before he was sacked.

Now you’re bringing up these BS “elimination” games again to make your choke artist boyfriend Dak look better again by diminishing Romo, completely forgetting the context of all three games.

Pot meet kettle.
 
Last edited:
Johannes44 said:
When they gave him more he did nothing. When they gave him less he regressed and struggled even more.
Click to expand...
Hmm...

So in your opinion whats the solution? Because he's not going anywhere, especially the next two years... unless you want to wash $180M+.

Not trying just seems like a cowards way out to me.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

Total: 481 (members: 53, guests: 428)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,920
Messages
13,905,451
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top