Injuries are part of the game

Good post.

Btw:


Whos the backup for our new one tech?

And if we dont have one. Then who should have started before we aquired him?

I think OSA & Thomas the ex Jet were starters until Clark . Now it’s OSA & Clark with Thomas Toia and Mazi in the bullpen .
 
Words mean things, just as the absence of them means things.
ANYONE...who's been around team sports...knows the meaning of "depth" when somone says "depth".

even rambo2.

The whole "we have just as many players as everyone else" DOES NOT equate to depth...at all.

And in fact could be incorrect at certain positions. Some teams will have more or less postional players than others. Which mean they aren't the same numbers, regardless of quality.

We have decent depth at WR.

We have almost none at RB.

Regardless of how many players.
 
To that end the Cowboys brought Ryan Flournoy back he’s on the PS and OL Saahdiq Charles is gone . Along with Brooks Cropper and Holden the Cowboys have decent call ups just in case . Now the RB depth that’s a different story …Mafah who would have made a nice red zone goal line option not available until 25 % of the season is up in smoke . Here’s hoping Blue does something
23.5%
 
BS. You’ve been spending too much time here and letting the plethora of haters here to influence you.
Maybe spending too much time here, far from a hater though pal. Plus what I wrote is at least a printed as fact by some pundits, hey there is even a team rating for team depth, imagine that concept!
 
BS. You’ve been spending too much time here and letting the plethora of haters here to influence you.
If weren't for people who don't always see thru rose colored glasses this forum would be like OZ over the rainbow, our current depth situation is a product of poor to little free agency activity, average drafting, an owner who doesn't know x's and o's yet runs the team and poor scouting of late, these are the facts and they are indisputable my friend. :thumbup:
 
Maybe spending too much time here, far from a hater though pal. Plus what I wrote is at least a printed as fact by some pundits, hey there is even a team rating for team depth, imagine that concept!
So because some “pundit” says it, it must be fact?

I rest my case. Hate on bro.
 
You made a case for depth? I guess I missed it, go back to taking out the trash for your landlord.
 
ANYONE...who's been around team sports...knows the meaning of "depth" when somone says "depth".

even rambo2.

The whole "we have just as many players as everyone else" DOES NOT equate to depth...at all.

And in fact could be incorrect at certain positions. Some teams will have more or less postional players than others. Which mean they aren't the same numbers, regardless of quality.

We have decent depth at WR.

We have almost none at RB.

Regardless of how many players.
LOL

Feel better?
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,565
Messages
14,545,802
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top