And there goes that silly theory that you don't need a good RB

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
60,852
Reaction score
63,942
Even though that theory has been busted over and over and over, people are still repeating that mantra. "You can find good RBs all over the draft, no reason to take on early."

Well, w/o Walker being a complete stud last night, it's a completely different game. And no, an average RB does not take over the game as Walker did.

The RB position is extremely important, the thought that you can easily find one in the 4th is just false. Repeating it makes one sound rather silly and foolish.
 
Ehh…I don’t know if that changes the narrative you can’t get one in the 4th. I’d take Javonte over him. I’d probably take about 15 backs over him.
 
Several of Walker's big gains came on plays where the Patriots front blew up his hole, and he was just able to bounce the run. Definitely not something any RB could do, you need to have Walker's kind of high-octane athleticism.
He deserves tons of credit he was a beast but before that game nobody was calling him a great back
 
Even though that theory has been busted over and over and over, people are still repeating that mantra. "You can find good RBs all over the draft, no reason to take on early."

Well, w/o Walker being a complete stud last night, it's a completely different game. And no, an average RB does not take over the game as Walker did.

The RB position is extremely important, the thought that you can easily find one in the 4th is just false. Repeating it makes one sound rather silly and foolish.
He was a 2nd round draft pick. In 4 years he's had over 1000 yards twice. Williams, Dowdle, and Pollard had more yards this year than Walker.
 
Even though that theory has been busted over and over and over, people are still repeating that mantra. "You can find good RBs all over the draft, no reason to take on early."

Well, w/o Walker being a complete stud last night, it's a completely different game. And no, an average RB does not take over the game as Walker did.

The RB position is extremely important, the thought that you can easily find one in the 4th is just false. Repeating it makes one sound rather silly and foolish.
There are examples of good running backs taken in every round. The team needs defense
 
Even though that theory has been busted over and over and over, people are still repeating that mantra. "You can find good RBs all over the draft, no reason to take on early."

Well, w/o Walker being a complete stud last night, it's a completely different game. And no, an average RB does not take over the game as Walker did.

The RB position is extremely important, the thought that you can easily find one in the 4th is just false. Repeating it makes one sound rather silly and foolish.
Why i am not disagreeing with anything you said. But his job got easier b/c NE defense was worn down b/c they were on the field a lot. combine a good run game w/ a good defense is still valuable.
 
It only strengthens the necessity of a team's front office, coaching staff, scouting department, and (most importantly) the ultimate decision-maker for player acquisitions, to vet all available college and veteran players for the best candidates every single offseason. As @CaptainAmerica12 points out, Walker was a 41st overall pick. He was a selection, who excelled when it mattered the most.

Those are the players any front office must acquire, retain, and build quickly around. Wait too long trial-and-erroring and even your best selected players will either age out or become 'too costly' to keep--although I am hesitant to believe the Joneses whenever they say any player will cost too much.
 
Even though that theory has been busted over and over and over, people are still repeating that mantra. "You can find good RBs all over the draft, no reason to take on early."

Well, w/o Walker being a complete stud last night, it's a completely different game. And no, an average RB does not take over the game as Walker did.

The RB position is extremely important, the thought that you can easily find one in the 4th is just false. Repeating it makes one sound rather silly and foolish.
Well, Walker was a second-round pick. I think that if we used our second-round picks on running backs and corners, like Seattle, rather than on injured players, we would be better off.

Walker is also a smart player. He waits and lets the blocks develop. We wasted a top pick on Elliott, who dives straight into the offensive line before the blocks are set.

If we had used our second-round pick on a running back, we could have had Derrick Henry.
 
Even though that theory has been busted over and over and over, people are still repeating that mantra. "You can find good RBs all over the draft, no reason to take on early."

Well, w/o Walker being a complete stud last night, it's a completely different game. And no, an average RB does not take over the game as Walker did.

The RB position is extremely important, the thought that you can easily find one in the 4th is just false. Repeating it makes one sound rather silly and foolish.
Meanwhile, after watching last night, Pickens looks far less important.
 
You can find good RBs all throughout the draft but the difference makers usually require heavy investment.
 
Who was the RB for Washington back in the 80's?
Timmy Smith or something like that.
Did nothing after that game he had in the SB. Ran for something like 202 yards.
I thought about posting Smith too. I have watched how Seattle has used him since he was drafted. He is a good back, but has been slowed at times with injuries. This was probably his most injury free season to date. He is definitely above a back like Smith.
 
Treveyon Henderson (38th overall draft pick: high 2nd round)

How was his performance yesterday in the Super Bowl for the Patriots?

6 carries, 19 yards, 0 TDs.

Our 5th round draft pick (Jaydon Blue) could have performed better.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
474,586
Messages
14,546,936
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top