DarkVader33
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,568
- Reaction score
- 1,785
We know who you are. But we’re not allowed to say it here.Oh, you don’t have to say anything. The fact that defense of this garbage FO is all you wrote tells us exactly who you are
We know who you are. But we’re not allowed to say it here.Oh, you don’t have to say anything. The fact that defense of this garbage FO is all you wrote tells us exactly who you are
Reggie White had 16 sacks at age 37 for Green Bay. Garrett is the closest player I’ve seen to Reggie White.He's a great guy!!
Has anyone even thought that trading this much for a 30 year old player, going on 31??? YIkes
There are no guarantees that Myles Garrett will play until he's 37 years old.Reggie White had 16 sacks at age 37 for Green Bay. Garrett is the closest player I’ve seen to Reggie White.
I totally agree with you. Multiple trade downs can net us several legit starters.NO.
Use the 1st rounders, that can be used for 3 players over the next 2 years.
Also slight trade down can get 4 or 5 players.
Not worth it to give up all that draft capitol for 1 players.
Pickens and 12 for Garrett and their 2nd or 3rd. Garrett with Clark and Q….damn. We have 3 starting corners and 2 new safeties….still need to draft LB with out other first….but Garrett with those other two would be nuts.I would just trade Pickens straight up.
Several players have been great into their 30s as far as pass rushers. Greene, Bruce smith, Reggie white, Doleman, and a few others….all productive into early 30s, still making 1st and second team all pro. Danille Hunter is older than him and he still looks great. Helps that Garrett is in great shape, no injuries, takes care of himself. We could get 4 more years no issue, plenty of players his caliber did it already.He's a great guy!!
Has anyone even thought that trading this much for a 30 year old player, going on 31??? YIkes
Guy just set the all time sack record and you say he is past his primeGarrett will be 31 in December his best days are past him who in their right mind trades two first round picks for a guy you might get 2 years out of.
Most players are retired by 29 years old the average career is three and a half years.
Garrett is a great player but he is on borrowed time sure some players play into their late 30s but this is the exception rather than the rule.
First round draft picks on rookie contracts makes much more sense
Agree….especially if we could get a 3rd back. We picked up a starting corner and safety (maybe 2) in FA, so we need LB still but can get one with 12, and use the 3rds for more…..Garrett with Q and Clark makes our line a total force. We don’t need all pros at every level, having an all pro pass rusher with a all pro and pro bowler DT combo will make a big difference on the back end too.Pickens and our 20th pick all day long.
L.O.L.!!! Whatever window the team had with Dak was during his rookie contract. It’s just jersey sales and marketing deals now while they scratch and claw to 7 wins to avoid the ultimate doom and unforgivable 4-5 win season. What successful teams trade a 1st and second round pick on one player at the mid season trade deadline that are floundering in a failed season? A team determined to keep the average fan tuned into the games through the end of the season.Super Bowl........
Of course. It’s the only target the Jones boys will aim at nowAround the rim.
Did Pickens sign his franchise tag? I did not see that.Pickens and 12 for Garrett and their 2nd or 3rd. Garrett with Clark and Q….damn. We have 3 starting corners and 2 new safeties….still need to draft LB with out other first….but Garrett with those other two would be nuts.
This is just NOT gonna happen. It's not going to be anywhere near as easy as simply going down to the corner store and getting a loaf of bread. It's a 41 million dollar cap hit for the Browns if they trade him before June 1. After their draft class is accounted for they would be only ~10 million under the cap...so that 41 mil hit would put them roughly 30 million over. He also has a no-trade clause, which means he only goes where he wants to go.Pickens and 20 should get it done, imo. Throw in a day 2 pick next year if we absolutely have to.
True….he may flat out reject it knowing it was the browns lol, unless they were willing to give him big dollars, then maybe he would sign and trade? For Daks window, getting Garrett for another 4 years would be a great pickup. Could draft another wr with our other first. I just don’t trust for sure getting real impact players in the draft, and Garret is a known, current high level player with zero red flags.Did Pickens sign his franchise tag? I did not see that.
All teams know AJ Brown will be available after June 1. He can be had for a 2027 3rd round pick and the acquiring team would owe him $29 million for the 2026 season and for $4 million guaranteed him for 2027, they could pay it and walk away with no cap hit, if so disposed. Significantly less risk than the massive deal Pickens will want. And significantly less to give up than Dallas will want for Pickens.This is just NOT gonna happen. It's not going to be anywhere near as easy as simply going down to the corner store and getting a loaf of bread. It's a 41 million dollar cap hit for the Browns if they trade him before June 1. After their draft class is accounted for they would be only ~10 million under the cap...so that 41 mil hit would put them roughly 30 million over. He also has a no-trade clause, which means he only goes where he wants to go.
And on the Pickens side? Highly unlikely that he will be traded before the draft. There are no reports of any negotiations with any other teams. Hell...ain't much talking in Dallas right now. He has to sign the tag before he can be traded.
And...why would Cleveland want to pair a near 40 mil/yr WR with a rookie QB, when they could simply draft one at #6 (i.e...Carnell Tate) and save a ton of cash?
The Browns obviously have a plan of what they want to do with Garrett. I don’t think anyone believes it involves using him to acquire a top wide receiver.True….he may flat out reject it knowing it was the browns lol, unless they were willing to give him big dollars, then maybe he would sign and trade? For Daks window, getting Garrett for another 4 years would be a great pickup. Could draft another wr with our other first. I just don’t trust for sure getting real impact players in the draft, and Garret is a known, current high level player with zero red flags.
