The Browns adjusted Garrett's contract (more tradeable) -- (See new thread)

[DarkVader33]

No you're just trying to twist words because you know you were wrong and now you're backtracking you're trying to just rearrange what we were talking about no that that doesn't work..

Never was a binding agreement yes the value was set by the Ravens overpaying with compensation for Max Crosby but the Cowboys offered less slightly less they didn't win they tried a couple of times but that doesn't matter The value of something is whatever someone else is willing to pay but not everyone is willing to pay that So just because Max Crosby somebody made a run at him with over compensation doesn't mean Garrett gets to also one up that and get more whatever you're talking about you're playing with words you're twisting them trying to fit it into your narrative and you're wrong so I'm moving on it doesn't matter garrett will not be here If they're asking prices more than Crosby how about we just leave it there..

That was not binding just because one person thought Crosby was worth 2 1st rounder does not mean Garrett is worth more It doesn't work that way you have to factor in their salaries their age their structures and the team who's bidding on him how much can they afford..

So compensation is not automatically set from 1 scenario to the next it is what you can get for the player and every player in their situations like age contracts and all that come into play and you have to find one team that thinks they are a player away to overpay..

That is and the Cowboys are not in a position to overpay for Garrett and I'm leaving it right there it doesn't matter there was no binding agreement The Ravens were the only ones who wanted to overpay and even sent him back They got a refund they thought that OK in hindsight while we had the opportunity to back out of a verbal agreement we found out we overpay we didn't want to overpay therefore that is not what Crosby's price was and therefore it does not set Garrett's market..

Just like JSNs new contract, does not change anything for George Pickens ,they are in a different situation, so you could keep finding ways to twist all this but you have to find 2 entities both willing to agree upon compensation and verbal does that make it binding and it does not have an effect on any others going forward.



That only works in some scenarios but not in this one. Yeah so there you go it's just like things on eBay something might be worth $400 but when you get two to three people over bidding because I really want it for some reason it raises the price that does not make it worth more because somebody was willing to overpay..

im out,

GODDBYE!

I generally agree with your post but you’re missing something. The cap keeps going up like crazy every year. So every year everyone’s worth rises. Unfortunately, it usually rises more for the already best paid ones.

 

[Stash]

The current Eagles regime has been more successful in Garrett’s adult life than the Cowboys utterly mismanaged NFL franchise.

Yes, they did. But that’s over.

Garrett has a window, too.

Yep. And Dallas’ arrow is pointing up and the Eagles is pointing down.

 

[Coogiguy03]

Well, there's a nugget out there suggesting Philly trades Jaden Carter and Brown or Carter and their 1st for Garrett.

BTW........Adam Berry, who is Andrew Berry's twin brother, works for the Eagles.

Something is going on with the Eagles ...........I can feel it (LOL LOL)


Howie Roseman
’s brother does not work for the Cleveland Browns. Cleveland Browns General Manager Andrew Berry has a twin brother,
Adam Berry
, who works in the Philadelphia Eagles front office as Vice President of Football Operations and Strategy.
Andrew Berry
previously worked under Howie Roseman with the Eagles

I was about to say who is this berry person lol, ok I gotcha, hey they can do it, I see that being a part of a the deal Carter or Brown. What a way to piss Brown off by sending him to Cleveland!! lol

 

[CTcowboy203]

No you're just trying to twist words because you know you were wrong and now you're backtracking you're trying to just rearrange what we were talking about no that that doesn't work..

Never was a binding agreement yes the value was set by the Ravens overpaying with compensation for Max Crosby but the Cowboys offered less slightly less they didn't win they tried a couple of times but that doesn't matter The value of something is whatever someone else is willing to pay but not everyone is willing to pay that So just because Max Crosby somebody made a run at him with over compensation doesn't mean Garrett gets to also one up that and get more whatever you're talking about you're playing with words you're twisting them trying to fit it into your narrative and you're wrong so I'm moving on it doesn't matter garrett will not be here If they're asking prices more than Crosby how about we just leave it there..

That was not binding just because one person thought Crosby was worth 2 1st rounder does not mean Garrett is worth more It doesn't work that way you have to factor in their salaries their age their structures and the team who's bidding on him how much can they afford..

So compensation is not automatically set from 1 scenario to the next it is what you can get for the player and every player in their situations like age contracts and all that come into play and you have to find one team that thinks they are a player away to overpay..

That is and the Cowboys are not in a position to overpay for Garrett and I'm leaving it right there it doesn't matter there was no binding agreement The Ravens were the only ones who wanted to overpay and even sent him back They got a refund they thought that OK in hindsight while we had the opportunity to back out of a verbal agreement we found out we overpay we didn't want to overpay therefore that is not what Crosby's price was and therefore it does not set Garrett's market..

Just like JSNs new contract, does not change anything for George Pickens ,they are in a different situation, so you could keep finding ways to twist all this but you have to find 2 entities both willing to agree upon compensation and verbal does that make it binding and it does not have an effect on any others going forward.



That only works in some scenarios but not in this one. Yeah so there you go it's just like things on eBay something might be worth $400 but when you get two to three people over bidding because I really want it for some reason it raises the price that does not make it worth more because somebody was willing to overpay..

im out,

GODDBYE!

According to the nfl ….you are wrong. GOODBYE****

 

[blueblood70]

According to the nfl ….you are wrong. GOODBYE****

Absolutely not If I was wrong Crosby would be a damn Raven now goodbye to you Sir.

I Said goodbye.

 

[KingCorcoran]

Yes, they did. But that’s over.


Yep. And Dallas’ arrow is pointing up and the Eagles is pointing down.

Last season the Cowboys were closer to fourth place than 1st place. Don’t dismiss the Giants and Commanders. They weren’t much better than either of those teams last season. I’m sure both intend to gain ground on the Eagles, too. Already not much ground between them and the Cowboys.

 

[Shannon1]

Can we get rid of this post ! They just said they are not trading him period!

 

[CTcowboy203]

Absolutely not If I was wrong Crosby would be a damn Raven now goodbye to you Sir.

I Said goodbye.

You said godbye buddy

 

[Stash]

Last season the Cowboys were closer to fourth place than 1st place.

And they beat Philadelphia once and actually should have beaten them twice.

And they’re no longer playing with half a team and no defense.

Don’t dismiss the Giants and Commanders. They weren’t much better than either of those teams last season. I’m sure both intend to gain ground on the Eagles, too. Already not much ground between them and the Cowboys.

The Giants honestly should have swept the Cowboys. I think Washington is moving in the wrong direction, like Philadelphia.

 

[Reality]

New article with quotes from Browns GM posted in a new thread ..
https://cowboyszone.com/threads/esp...t-contract-tweak-unrelated-to-a-trade.543729/