Acceptablename
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,156
- Reaction score
- 3,654
The releasing of MiltonHaters of who or what exactly?
The releasing of MiltonHaters of who or what exactly?
A lot of us were wrong. I still stand by I don't think Sam howell outplayed him but I can admit I was wrong no team claimed him. Everyone can gloat they were right who was right. Cookie time lol.From listening to everybody yesterday, I thought we made the worst move since releasing Jimmy Smith
I haven't lied one time about Howell. You've lied about him. So why would you accuse me of having something against someone for telling the ttruth about them?He's getting close to the ignore button anyway. I think Sam Howell stole his lunch money as a kid or something.
I would have kept him over Howell, but appears there were some things I wasn't noticing, or maybe it's just experience vs. inexperience. No team claiming him doesn't mean he didn't play well or doesn't have talent. It just means teams don't know what he's going to be at this point, so why cut their guy for him?A lot of us were wrong. I still stand by I don't think Sam howell outplayed him but I can admit I was wrong no team claimed him. Everyone can gloat they were right who was right. Cookie time lol.
If someone refuses to answer my questions in real life I wouldn't I tell them to answer like a man? Lol. And again.....you dodged. SmhI've never engaged in such heated arguments over a backup QB ever in all my years here.
Final tally: several threads, one challenge to my manhood, and a shade of embarrassment as to how I probably reacted to some comments.
I guess it's true, we act online differently than we do in real life. I fell into some traps. But I truly do respect all of your opinions. And one day we'll all be laughing about this. Well, maybe some of us but you get my meaning.
I don't know man....some of the talk I heard this week was how he was arguably the best backup QB in the league.....and in preseason he played like it. I mean some teams have 4 or 5 QB's on their 53.I would have kept him over Howell, but appears there were some things I wasn't noticing, or maybe it's just experience vs. inexperience. No team claiming him doesn't mean he didn't play well or doesn't have talent. It just means teams don't know what he's going to be at this point, so why cut their guy for him?
He just spammed a whole post over Milton lol. And its been happening since yesterday lol. I get why people do it with Dak he's here and you know he's polarizing. WHat on earth did Milton due to warrant that energy lol:
Doug actually went 0-2 as the starter to end the Skins' regular season after the team started 11-2 (Jay Schroeder and a replacement whom I can't remember).I don’t think Williams started the year in 87. Plunket was defintely a backup in 80 but I don’t think he was in 83.
Not sure that was any kind of serious thought.
Yes...we have a coupple people that would step in for Dak if it mean he was gone.
But...really? We give them any attention?
I admit...I hoped we'd keep him and keep working on him. Not to replace Dak any time soon....not to win super bowls because of him.
because I think he's very similar to Overshown. If you can teach him to put a NASCAR governor on it...he MIGHT be good.
what’s taking so long….
Ah. Good times.Reminds me somewhat of the old days and the great Hutchinson/Carter debate that I mostly stayed out of. While so many were arguing I was like......." You know they BOTH suck right? You also know I want them BOTH gone as soon as humanly possible. " Now THAT was an all timer waste of bandwidth right there. Glad those days are behind us....... some real suckage for Cowboys fans back then.
We spent 9 pages discussing a third-string running back, so I'm not sure why this is a waste in comparison. Seems like a lot of fans just have an opinion about Joe.All this talk about someone who's never done anything in the NFL and most likely never will. Seems like such a waste.........
what’s taking so long….
Will he be back in Dallas?
