Aaron Rodgers says he's a big fan of Dak and doesn't understand all the criticism he receives

Of course Dak is "good"... There isn't much doubt about that.

Is he good enough to take a team deep in the playoffs? That's another question.
 
:laugh:

You are exactly why I came into this thread. I knew the regulars would come in hear to say how he really meant the opposite of what he said to support the poster's narrative on Dak because there is no way that anyone would have a different view than them on Dak.

You post is a prime example of fans Desperately tying themselves into pretzels to prove that nobody thinks Dak is a good QB. Thank you for not letting me down. :laugh:
You can always count on The Great CowboysKnicksBamaFan to come through for you chief.
 
"All the criticism he receives"

What? Where is all this criticism coming from in Rodgers' circles?

Is Prescott getting heat in the media that I'm not seeing? Strange and interesting comment from Rodgers.
 
Let me put this way, Aaron. You know how you only have one ring? Dak has one less than you...
 
I don’t have a problem with Dak, I have a problem with the end results. If the formula isn’t working even good players should be reevaluated.

At this point ripping on Dak is pointless as 95% of your roster is what it is as this point. That said if this team ends up with 7 to 9 wins how much longer do we stay happy because our QB makes a top 10 list every preseason?
Like you said everyone should be reevaluated. I think as a top 10 QB you should be a walking 9 to 10 wins. If healthy he has been aside from the disastrous last two years. But then you had one of the worst defenses in the league. If they don’t get to 10 wins next year he should be reevaluated. 10 wins should be the floor.
 
Truthfully Aaron is a go against the grain type of guy. So yeah Dak is a polarizing figure so he’s a good topic for him to latch on to.

He said this one other year too when Mike was here. Probably the only guy who really goes in depth about Dak that’s a current or former player.
 
Doesn't this directly oppose the "team game" mantra?

Do you hold this same standard with regards to playoff wins?
I don’t care about that whole stupid “what’s a team game” conversation you guys keep having. Like I told someone yesterday whether it’s a team game or not it’s whatever you want it to be.

At the end of the a day a team with a top 10 QB should flirt around 9 or 10 wins. Especially in a 17 game season.
 
I don’t care about that whole stupid “what’s a team game” conversation you guys keep having. Like I told someone yesterday whether it’s a team game or not it’s whatever you want it to be.

At the end of the a day a team with a top 10 QB should flirt around 9 or 10 wins. Especially in a 17 game season.
Ok.

Let the record show tmc believes QB's should account for wins by themselves.
 
I don’t care about that whole stupid “what’s a team game” conversation you guys keep having. Like I told someone yesterday whether it’s a team game or not it’s whatever you want it to be.

At the end of the a day a team with a top 10 QB should flirt around 9 or 10 wins. Especially in a 17 game season.
How about a top 10 QB on a team with the 31st worst defense? What should their record be?
 

"And we had a couple of battles in the playoffs over the years."

Where did MLFootball snip this clip from? I would not mind hearing the complete passage for the whole context, including the interviewer's question that prompted Aaron Rodgers' comment.

Rodgers has played many games against other quarterbacks in the playoffs. Not sure why he added that extra self-reflection for emphasis.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
475,289
Messages
14,597,366
Members
24,217
Latest member
Cowboysforlyfe47
Back
Top