Holley: That's the difference between Dak and Romo

He’s not a hater. He just calls it like he sees it. I watch most of the cowboys podcasts and not too many of them keeps it real. They stay finding the silver lining or moral victory’s. They wait til players leave to really speak their mind.

Like Zeke. His last two years here before the released him, all the fans kept saying to give Pollard more of the carries and most of these guys were dancing around the subject not being objective and then Zeke finally leaves and they all change their stance saying “yeah Zeke been done for a while. I dunno why the cowboys kept giving him the main role “. Same thing with Schultz, Diggs, even LVE.

The commanders don’t have nearly as big as network of media as the cowboys but they are objective wand will rip the commanders a new one whenever it’s deserved. They’re not afraid to criticize the gm, owner, or starting qb.

I always said what happen RG3 inDc would never happen to a Cowboys qb. Same thing with the ravens.. they were calling for Ray Lewis to retire. Because he fell off that bad his last years.


East coast media is way more real and honest with themselves then what I hear from these cowboys media members.

I don’t always agree with Holley but is precise his realism and objective when it comes to the boys. It’s only a few that will Call it like it is. Him, Nick , sometimes Nate Newton, Ambar, and Stanback

It’s a new podcast with James Washington and Nate that don’t sugarcoat anything. Might be my new favorite one
He admits he’s a hater. “Tells it like he sees it”. That’s what all the haters say.
 


He's right.

How can you not throw that pass to a wide open WR to win the freaking game

How absolutely stupid and moronic do you have to be to say: the WR is open, if i throw to him we will win the game but no, no, no, my HC told me to throw the ball away, so……
 
This is so overblown. I don't think Schottenheimer literally meant to just snap it and throw it away. He meant don't take any stupid chances, to throw it away if you don't like what you see.

This is the problem now with coaches trying to take bullets for players. The age old wisdom is for leaders to take responsibility, but the media and fans take this literally and think he really meant, "Just throw it away, don't even try to score here." Of course he wanted to score, otherwise they'd just kick the FG on third down.
"Make sure you don't take a sack"!
Don't think either individual has a lot of confidence in Broderick Jones!
 
Yes. Of course. Only an ignorant person would ask me that stupid question. :facepalm:

You hang out here even though you never have anything good to say. I've been a Cowboys fan for a loooong time, through thick and thin. So I waste my time here because I'm a fan of this team. You probably have no life in the real world, so you choose to spend your time here with others like yourself, on a team y'all don't support. It makes absolutely no sense unless you have no life.

No go troll someone else because I am not the one.
lol...kids these days. I'm better than you. Cowboys on one.
 
Good point but the DB's were powerless once the catch was made. Flowers would have just given himself up and the timeout still would have been called.

What the Cowboys should have done was kick the ball short, force a return, and leave the Ravens no more than a couple seconds. They would have just took a knee and went to OT in that case.
The play isn’t over until the DB tackles him or touches him while on the ground. The clock would have run out if the DB didn’t immediately tackle him.
 
This is so overblown. I don't think Schottenheimer literally meant to just snap it and throw it away. He meant don't take any stupid chances, to throw it away if you don't like what you see.

This is the problem now with coaches trying to take bullets for players. The age old wisdom is for leaders to take responsibility, but the media and fans take this literally and think he really meant, "Just throw it away, don't even try to score here." Of course he wanted to score, otherwise they'd just kick the FG on third down.
But he was wide open. If was an intentional throw away after a timeout.
 
Romo played stupid and lost the game. He was a gunslinger that couldn't just check it down for an easy first down. He wasn't even the biggest problem in that game but come on man.
Wasn't even the biggest problem that game? With a 143 passer rating I would hope not. Our fan base really is braindead at times.
 
Wasn't even the biggest problem that game? With a 143 passer rating I would hope not. Our fan base really is braindead at times.
Never said he was. Murray fumbling and Bailey missing field goals were big problems. It is funny how when it's Romo it's a team game but when it's Dak it's all his fault huh.
 
Okay, so why then does Romo only have three more game winning drives despite playing for 2 years longer than Dak?

Considering the fact that Romo had a much higher INT rate than Dak, perhaps the former should have played a little more conservative.

Dak didn't pass rush or defend the pass during the Cowboys last defensive play.

This loss lay squarely on the shoulders of the coaches. Clearly, they took their eyes off the game at the wrong time. They were planning their overtime while the Ravens won the game with the last play from scrimmage. The defensive effort on that play was pathetic.
 
People defending Romo is his bad decisions which cost us many games. Crazy. The guy would go rogue, and his decisions would fail over and over again.

That is what you're defending??? :facepalm:
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
476,013
Messages
14,657,059
Members
24,226
Latest member
Dorsett99Yards
Back
Top