Is this fact about "Red" really true?

WestCoastQB

Active Member
Messages
224
Reaction score
102
Red is 4-22 against teams with a .500 record or better?!?!?

Really?!? Is this accurate, and is this what a "process" is?

Wow...That Princeton education certainly gets results.
 
We all know his process isn't working. We just need Jerry to learn that simple equation.
 
lol Let the hate run through you.

JG is going to be here for a long time.
 
Where have you guys been the first dozen times this has been discussed? To which, the question is inevitably asked: "would you rather he got to .500 by beating more good teams and losing to more bad ones?" It's not like we don't all know what a .500 record entails.
 
Where have you guys been the first dozen times this has been discussed? To which, the question is inevitably asked: "would you rather he got to .500 by beating more good teams and losing to more bad ones?" It's not like we don't all know what a .500 record entails.

If we're gonna choose what we'd rather have I'd rather he surpassed .500 all together.
 
A team with a 500 record would on average lose far more games to winning teams than it wins....but not that much more.
A team with a .750 record, statisitcally , should spilt all it's games vs teams with winning records.

Is that measured by how the opponent finished the season or what their record was at the time they played?
Either way, that's horrific.

I was just curious; for example the Philly win earlier this season may end up being a win vs a team that finishes with a winning record, though they did not have a winning record at the time of the game.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,443
Messages
13,874,731
Members
23,791
Latest member
mashburn
Back
Top