Why not let Romo and Dak start back and forth and don't give me chemistry

It's really not though. Romo has lost the chemistry he had when he was like 22-7 with a lot of these same guys? (Minus the nfls best rb who dak has leaned on)
I dont think we know that is true. Heck he hasnt been able to play enough with the injuries since then to say he has lost anything.
 
I don't know about alternating games, but there are zero reasons why you couldn't have an in-season quarterback competition in practice (too bad the bye was not later). Neither player is above having to compete for the job and I would think once the competition was over everyone would be on board since it played out before them.
 
I don't know about alternating games, but there are zero reasons why you couldn't have an in-season quarterback competition in practice (too bad the bye was not later). Neither player is above having to compete for the job and I would think once the competition was over everyone would be on board since it played out before them.
We know who would win that.
 
Tom Landry tried this 40 years ago ....... it did not work then and it wont work now.

That is not how a team works.
 
Would a Reason be that we have reason to believe the nfls third all time rated passer is almost healthy again ?

Romo hasn't played for the most part of 2 years. Only way he should play this year is if Dak gets hurt . I love Romo but he is not entitled to anything at this point. The past is the past. That's just the way it is.....
 
Tom Landry tried this 40 years ago ....... it did not work then and it wont work now.

That is not how a team works.

What happened to the patriots chemistry when Bledsoe had to come in and play in the afccg? All that momentum Brady had!



The crimson manic doesn't play scared like you guys.
 
Romo hasn't played for the most part of 2 years. Only way he should play this year is if Dak gets hurt . I love Romo but he is not entitled to anything at this point. The past is the past. That's just the way it is.....
This isn't about loyalty this is about seeing if maybe the all pro still has it. With this team and a healthy romo I don't know if we keep going down two scores.
 
Ok rebuttal tho are you mad you can't say chemistry ? Well tough
not sure why you think a rebuttal is reasonable to expect when you take the main argument against it out of the mix. I believe this type experiment has been tried a few times over the years with embarrassingly bad results. Tried to look up but do not have the time to research past examples of this strategy at play.
 
ORRRRRR we can continue what's brought us to the best record in the league and not mess with it.
 
You know why the cowboys win? Bc their linemen move people. Chemistry and momentum are mostly imaginary so don't say that


They be scared to be interesting the nfls ratings are down let's save the league !

Mrs. Romo, is that you?

I love Tony, but as I've said before, he may be smart to a fault. His nuanced interpretation of our offense and variations on route, responsibilities, check-offs, i-play adjustments, etc may just be a bit much for the O; it may create uncertainty and hesitancy at times and lead to blown plays, TOs and DOG penalties.

The simplified straight-forward schemes they're running now may provide for more player confidence and better execution, and surprisingly good outcomes.

That's chemistry 101.
 
Romo hasn't played for the most part of 2 years. Only way he should play this year is if Dak gets hurt . I love Romo but he is not entitled to anything at this point. The past is the past. That's just the way it is.....

He shouldn't play if he's better (hint: he is)? Seems kind of like hamstringing the team to me.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
464,596
Messages
13,820,819
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top