Any OL gurus in the house?

Please. Callahan is a guy who is a failed former head coach. No one in this league likes him as an OC either. He was never a threat

This is correct. He seems to be coveted by some as a position coach (he did recommend Travis Frederick) but when has he ever been a successful offensive coordinator since the Raiders' were blown out in the Super Bowl?
 
Tony Wise is actually the one that "built" that line. Although Tuinei, Newton, and Gogan were already on the team when Wise arrived with Jimmy Johnson.

All 3 were on Cowboys but not one of them excelled until Jimmy and his new coaching staff arrived in 1989.

The OL downright reeked until Emmitt was drafted in 1991.
 
Please. Callahan is a guy who is a failed former head coach. No one in this league likes him as an OC either. He was never a threat

Well Callahan was the reason why we did so well in 2014. Not Garrett or Linehan. He seems to be doing well in Washington. Compare that to a failure of a coach and OC we have now I would take Callahan any day over them.
 
Well Callahan was the reason why we did so well in 2014. Not Garrett or Linehan. He seems to be doing well in Washington. Compare that to a failure of a coach and OC we have now I would take Callahan any day over them.

Right.

Had nothing to do with Romo being able to stay healthy and Murray and Dez having career years. Let's give it all to Callahan who was stripped of play calling duties prior to the season. That's some rock solid logic.
 
Callahan long gone and Alexander shown the door
and with Houck and Colombo now on task
is zone blocking gone?

I think this is less about the scheme than it is technique.

David Moore with the DMN writes that some players were not taking to the hand techniques he was teaching. Meanwhile, in Cincy, the Bengals have going from having the 20th-ranked line under Alexander last year to having the eighth-ranked line under our former line coach, Pollack.

Colombo was brought in as an assistant under Callahan so he's been schooled as a coach in both zone and man blocking. According to past articles on Houck, he stresses technique and effort, and the lineman having an overall understanding of what is going on and not just their assignment.

So, I don't think zone blocking is gone, and it's possible we might even use more of it. The main change will be in what's asked of the linemen techniquewise.
 
Nov.5, Monday night, we'll see what happens. I like columbo. Hope for the best.
 
If the idea is the identity of the team is through the OL and the run game, this needs to be the direction.
If only this were true and not cast aside at the first sign of a challenge. Like trading away a first round pick because you think the issue is WR. I can promise you one thing. WR is not great but it is not the root cause of our issues. The root cause is our inability to run the ball and pass protect, especially on the road.

Turn overs on defense would also help.
 
Callahan long gone and Alexander shown the door
and with Houck and Colombo now on task
is zone blocking gone?


Zone blocking works best with athletic linemen , which is what the Cowboys offensive line is now..................Man-to-man blocking is optimal when you have maulers like the Great Wall of Dallas from the '90's......................
 
  • Like
Reactions: BAT
If only this were true and not cast aside at the first sign of a challenge. Like trading away a first round pick because you think the issue is WR. I can promise you one thing. WR is not great but it is not the root cause of our issues. The root cause is our inability to run the ball and pass protect, especially on the road.

Turn overs on defense would also help.
But ever since teams in 2017 realized that Dez was no longer a threat have put more men in the box and still able to bracket Beasley. That hurt their ability to run the ball and then when they are in 3rd and long the defense can also pressure more, because again they don't see a deep threat.
 
Right.

Had nothing to do with Romo being able to stay healthy and Murray and Dez having career years. Let's give it all to Callahan who was stripped of play calling duties prior to the season. That's some rock solid logic.

Why is that not logical? Linehan even said to Garrett that "the team" should use some of the run-plays that Callahan created. Thus Callahan was our running game coordinator while Linehan controlled the passing game. Romo stayed healthy for 3 years previous to that year while Murray was our main back. Where was the production then? Logical is right. Callahan was the reason we did well running the ball in 2014. To ignore that fact is simply naive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BAT
Why is that not logical? Linehan even said to Garrett that "the team" should use some of the run-plays that Callahan created. Thus Callahan was our running game coordinator while Linehan controlled the passing game. Romo stayed healthy for 3 years previous to that year while Murray was our main back. Where was the production then? Logical is right. Callahan was the reason we did well running the ball in 2014. To ignore that fact is simply naive.

And the reason we've run well since then is what?

2014 - 2354 rushing yards
2015 - 1890 yards with no QB to threaten the D
2016 - 2396 yards
2017 - 2170 yards - with our #1 suspended 6 games

Now where is the huge difference?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
475,026
Messages
14,577,179
Members
24,214
Latest member
whoami2066
Back
Top