Post Game Tweets (12/16/18)

[ConstantReboot]

He didn't get beat out by Dak. Dak was horrible in practice and Moore was ahead of him on the depth chart until he got hurt.

Dak played well in preseason to get the nod. Your making this thing up about Dak being horrible in practice.

 

[PAPPYDOG]

LOL…yeah, he never lost us a game.

At least we had a "Passing game" ......where you going without one of those under Dak?
You waiting for our Defense to become the Ravens 2000....or Zeke to run for 3000 yards....
Romo was 10 times the talent at QB Dak will ever be....and that's not a compliment as Daks Bar is so low....

 

[blumayne38]

What about the record for the most attempts as a rookie without throwing an int. Or the record for the greatest rookie season.

Rid

parcells daily for having tony hold kicks as a starting QB never heard of that

 

[cowboyschmps3]

Lol...he run plenty of plays he's run in college. Where have you been?

Read option? Lol that’s bout it. I ca say this though on those 3 and short and 4 and short why force the throw when your own momentum will take you over the first down line?

 

[Hennessy_King]

Rid

parcells daily for having tony hold kicks as a starting QB never heard of that

You do realize that was Romo's job for like 3 years and was his job starting that season. He fell apart when it mattered.

 

[khiladi]

You don't know Football just face it... you said colts were single high Safety and they wasn't then the whole cover 2 thing with Romo just give it give it up lol Do you know what 2018 route concepts can do for a QB... ask Goff

Show me where I said Colts were single high safety?

The Rams are also a big chunk offense and play a fast-pace and Goff was drafted as a number 1 QB for a reason.

So tell me how rub routes make Dak avoid throwing over the middle...

 

[khiladi]

It's more like you are trying to defend JG's crappy passing offense because of your hate for Dak. And all you are doing is stating BS like "Romo passed heavily from 7 step drop".
Next thing you are going to tell us is JG is a great head coach and it's Dak's fault we are losing.

I’ve been calling for Garrett since 2009 and his crappy passing offense since 2009, when everybody was calling him the “next Tom Landry”.

Just stop with the nonsense. Dak sucking and Garrett sucking aren’t mutually exclusive.

The only reason Dak Prescott is even starting for this organization is because of Jason Garrett..

 

[Zman5]

I’ve been calling for Garrett since 2009 and his crappy passing offense since 2009, when everybody was making excuses

Just stop with the nonsense.

The only reason Dak Prescott is even starting for this organization is because of Jason Garrett..

Stop with the BS. You made some dumb comments about JG's offense that was not true. I pointed it out and now you are trying to change the argument. The fact is JG's offense sucks and we are still running a version of it.
Just because you fell for the "Dak friendly" BS JG and Jerry is trying to sell, not everyone is buying it.

 

[khiladi]

Stop with the BS. You made some dumb comments about JG's offense that was not true. I pointed it out and now you are trying to change the argument. The fact is JG's offense sucks and we are still running a version of it.
Just because you fell for the "Dak friendly" BS JG and Jerry is trying to sell, not everyone is buying it.

I made comments that were true.

You claimed our primary passing formation was shotguns with Romo in response to the fact I said Linehan traditionally dropped the 5-7 drop for Dak which he did, unlike for Romo. We used shot-gun in no huddle and empty sets primarily with Romo, while it’s a staple with Dak who PASSED EXCLUSiVELY out of shotgun IN COLLEGE.

You claimed I endorsed Jason Garrett, I did not. It’s you whose changing the argument.

You are claiming that the reason Dak doesn’t succeed is because of the passing routes, when analysts call out his accuracy all the time, which has nothing to do with passing routes.

You claimed we haven’t changed the offense for Dak, which is FALSE. Of course we haven’t changef every single passing routes, because we are still Coryell. That still doesn’t mean we haven’t significantly changed the offense for Dak with the passing routes. We run more screen, Zeke out of passing sets more, more misdirection more rub routes and have shorter routes.

The ONLY reason Dak has a job starting is because of Jason Garrett.

 

[Zman5]

I made comments that were true.

You claimed our primary passing formation was shotguns with Romo in response to the fact I said Linehan traditionally dropped the 5-7 drop for Dak which he did, unlike for Romo. We used shot-gun in no huddle and empty sets primarily with Romo, while it’s a staple with Dak who PASSED EXCLUSiVELY out of shotgun IN COLLEGE.

You claimed I endorsed Jason Garrett, I did not. It’s you whose changing the argument.

You are claiming that the reason Dak doesn’t succeed is because of the passing routes, when analysts call out his accuracy all the time, which has nothing to do with passing routes.

You claimed we haven’t changed the offense for Dak, which is FALSE. Of course we haven’t changef every single passing routes, because we are still Coryell. That still doesn’t mean we haven’t significantly changed the offense for Dak with the passing routes. We run more screen, Zeke out of passing sets more, more misdirection more rub routes and have shorter routes.

The ONLY reason Dak has a job starting is because of Jason Garrett.

You claimed our passing offense is completely different now than the one we've been running with JG. Your "proof" was "Romo passes heavily out of seven step drops." I told you that was BS. Then you came back with "Actually, it’s 5-7 yard drop".

You also said it's completely different because we run more screens. That's laughable. Just because you run a certain play more frequently doesn't change the scheme. Every team has a scheme and the frequency of play changes year to year depending on the roster. That doesn't mean they are running a different scheme. Patriots threw more deep passes when they had Moss. Now they don't. Did they change the scheme? No. They still run the same scheme. Get a clue.

The fact that you bought into "Dak' friendly" BS, it's obvious you don't understand basic football.

We are still running JG's scheme with some window dressing. Even JG said we do.

 

[khiladi]

You claimed our passing offense is completely different now than the one we've been running with JG. Your "proof" was "Romo passes heavily out of seven step drops." I told you that was BS. Then you came back with "Actually, it’s 5-7 yard drop".

You also said it's completely different because we run more screens. That's laughable. Just because you run a certain play more frequently doesn't change the scheme. Every team has a scheme and the frequency of play changes year to year depending on the roster. That doesn't mean they are running a different scheme. Patriots threw more deep passes when they had Moss. Now they don't. Did they change the scheme? No. They still run the same scheme. Get a clue.

The fact that you bought into "Dak' friendly" BS, it's obvious you don't understand basic football.

You are talking about passing routes and now you are talking about schemes. When I said they changed the offense it was on response to the claim that they didn’t change the passing routes and tailor it to Dak’s skill-set. You are wrong.. They did.. More play-action and shorter routes, more mid-direction and screens with Zeke used more in the passing game, including lining him out wide. They run him out of shotgun pretty much exclusively in passing LIKE HE DID IN COLLEGE. They dumbed down the route tree after he started in place of Romo.

When did I ever say they changed the Offense? Now you are using the Patriots as an example that proves my point, that while not changing the offense they tailored the offense to skill-set of their players with less deep routes.

I’ve been telling you we haven’t changed Coryell and I’ve said thousands of times on this forum that the reason they wentz Linehan is because they didn’t want to completely change offense, while maintaining the same terminology. Garrett didn’t want that and Jerry compromised with him.

Again, the ONLY reason Dak is starting is because of the guy you are blaming his lack of success on.

 

[Zman5]

You are talking about passing routes and now you are talking about schemes.. When did I ever say they changed the Coryell?

I said passing offense is the same. Are you now saying, passing offense is not part of the scheme? LOL.

 

[khiladi]

I said passing offense is the same. Are you now saying, passing offense is not part of the scheme? LOL.

Clearly you have no clue what your talking about, because you are all over the place.

You talked about passing routes. There are basic routes any WR uses common to all schemes. The fact that Dak can’t hit a majority of them downfield isn’t going to matter which ‘scheme’ he runs.

We even run more bunch routes with Dak. To claim we haven’t tailored this offense to Dak is just wrong. If you want to dispute degrees fine, but pretending this offense hasn’t taken into account Dak’s skills is just ridiculous.

It’s nasicalky just an excuse for his lack of success. Again, Dak only had the job because of Garrett. They are the guys that don’t allow others to compete with him in practice. They are the guys that observe him in practice.

 

[Zman5]

Clearly you have no clue what your talking about, because you are all over the place. You talked about passing routes. There are basic routes any WR uses common to all schemes. The fact that Dak can’t hit a majority of them downfield isn’t going to matter which ‘scheme’ he runs.

Keep trying to make this into a Dak argument. I clearly said the offense is the issue regardless of who the QB is. It can be Dak, Romo, Orton, Weedon, Cassel, etc. They all had issues with it. Yet you keep trying to say the offense is great and it's Dak's fault it's not working. Complete BS.

 

[khiladi]

Keep trying to make this into a Dak argument. I clearly said the offense is the issue regardless of who the QB is. It can be Dak, Romo, Orton, Weedon, Cassel, etc. They all had issues with it. Yet you keep trying to say the offense is great and it's Dak's fault it's not working. Complete BS.

Romo only played one season under Linehan as a play-caller and he was arguably the league MVP.

Even if I didn’t think the scheme was great, thinking we couldn’t be successful with Romo and Zeke playing the level he has is utterly asinine. Even the OL this year is better than it’s been when Garrett was play-caller.

Garrett doesn’t call the plays anymore.

Again, not sure what your point is.

 

[Zman5]

Romo only played one season under Linehan as a play-caller and he was arguably the league MVP.

Even if I didn’t think the scheme was great, thinking we couldn’t be successful with Romo and Zeke playing the level he has is utterly asinine. Even the OL this year is better than it’s been when Garrett was play-caller.

Garrett doesn’t call the plays anymore.

Using that stupid argument, 2016 offense with Dak was good enough to get us to 13-3. He had Are you now saying Dak is good in Linehan's offense? LOL.

 

[khiladi]

Using that stupid argument, 2016 offense with Dak was good enough to get us to 13-3. Are you now saying Dak is good in this offense? LOL.

Zeke and that OL that Callahan is and was that good.. absolutely.. There isn’t any doubt that we have the best rushing attack in the NFL bar none. That doesn’t mean I credit Garrett for it. Garrett has no clue about running the ball as is amply attested to by his play-calling here.

If we had Romo, we’d probably have had a SB..

 

[Zman5]

Zeke and that OL is and was that good.. absolutely..

Romo's best season had a great OL and Murray rushed for 1800+ yards that season. More than Zeke in 2016. Try again.

 

[khiladi]

Romo's best season had a great OL and Murray rushed for 1800+ yards that season. More than Zeke in 2016. Try again.

And? Now we have a legit defense and that year we didn’t even have Sean Lee the whole year.

We won a play-off game and were robbed in Lambeau in sub-freezing temperatures, where GB was undefeated. We destroyed Seattle earlier that season in their own house. Romo could have been MVP that year and he threw for 34 TDs and 9 INTs only and Dallas three the fourth least attempts of any team, meaning Romo was playing at an incredibly efficient level.

And 2016 we would have had the line Romo was working with, but playing a minimum of three years together. That was Zach Martin’s first year.

And Murray was a great back is not even close to as good as Zeke.

Again, I’m not sure what your point is other than demonstrating that Linehan is better playcaller than Garrett ever was.

 

[CalPolyTechnique]

At least we had a "Passing game" ......where you going without one of those under Dak?
You waiting for our Defense to become the Ravens 2000....or Zeke to run for 3000 yards....
Romo was 10 times the talent at QB Dak will ever be....and that's not a compliment as Daks Bar is so low....

The Romo vs. Dak is really a litmus test.

Even if you weren’t enamored with Romo, if you can’t see that Romo is superior to Dak in the art of QB’ing (i.e. passing, mechanics, accuracy, feel, understanding of opponents/schemes, et cetera) then it’s reflective of that person’s understanding of the game. It just is.

The way folks argue in defense of Dak to the lengths they do is no different than someone arguing about the superiority of Alex Smith. It’s laughable.