HungryLion
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 26,720
- Reaction score
- 60,785
Because Romo was talented from the get go, meaning this idea that his ‘development’ is similar to Dak and the latter needs more time is bogus.
If anything, Parcells stifled the development of Romo, because he wanted to play his veterans and win with them. He didn’t want to bench Bledsoe, but he was so awful he had to and Romo ended up saving the season. Anybody that was actually paying attention knew Romo was that dude.
With Dak’s he’s not talented as a passer, isn’t accurate nor does he practice well. The only thing they are going by supposedly is he has ‘it’ or some ‘intangibles’. They want people to buy the decision they can supposedly get to the promised land based on intangibles and that’s a joke.. They just saying this now because they don’t want to look stupid and are digging their heels further in this mess. They can’t sell his poor QB play.
But why do you think that is? I mean I am perfectly fine with them moving on from Dak, IF, and I definitely mean IF they actually invest in the position with a real prospect.
I don’t want any dumpster diving.
And I don’t want them signing diamond in the rough guys like they did post Aikman, until they GOT VERY LUCKY to find Romo.
If they move on from Dak they need to use a first, or second round pick and get a QB with legit talent.