I'm not taking a shot at either guy. The inference from dandydon52 was made that Dak played poorly and goff didnt in that game, hence Dak shouldn't be out after his season is over. Fact is goff threw roughly the same number of times as Dak for less yardage no tds and less completions. They were both sufficient. But to act as if Dak had a bad game and goff had a good game and those were the reasons the Rams won is misleading and blantantly false.
let me explain, Dak played good at times, but like all year , he is up and down, one drive he will be awful, then same next drive,
then out of nowhere, he is hitting passes throwing darts, so his playing bad was not the whole game , just in parts.
I looked at the stats, and dak did do better statistically, but sometimes it is on key plays to keep a drive going or to score
that a qb needs to be good, and that is more important than overall stats for a game.
Also to not make mistakes like take a sack when in FG range, and the sack takes them out of range.
Due to the lame coaches dallas has ,
Dak needs to be better to overcome the coaching, and to not be the direct cause of
sacks, or killing a drive.
Goff didnt have to be good in that game cause they ran the ball so good, he just had to not make mistakes.
He was a bus driver in that game.