links18
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 24,450
- Reaction score
- 20,325
4. Hate to say it, but I detected a condescending tone from the neighbor/homeowners-president lady when she said she "I can tell you where these dogs came from". People with money tend to be biased about who lives in their neighborhood.
I detected a lot of pain and anxiety from the woman who apparently lost a digit.
BTW, were they able to reattach it?
What the hell does #4 mean? Not following at all...1. If his dogs could get in her yard, then her fence was not secure.
2. If his dogs were gone or leaving then why were her dogs still outside?
3. If his dogs were dangerous to people then why are the people out there with them and why didn't his dogs bother anybody else?
4. Hate to say it, but I detected a condescending tone from the neighbor/homeowners-president lady when she said she "I can tell you where these dogs came from". People with money tend to be biased about who lives in their neighborhood.
1. it is up to any dog owner to make sure that his dog stays in his yard, and cant get out. especially with a pit bull.1. If his dogs could get in her yard, then her fence was not secure.
2. If his dogs were gone or leaving then why were her dogs still outside?
3. If his dogs were dangerous to people then why are the people out there with them and why didn't his dogs bother anybody else?
4. Hate to say it, but I detected a condescending tone from the neighbor/homeowners-president lady when she said she "I can tell you where these dogs came from". People with money tend to be biased about who lives in their neighborhood.
1. If his dogs could get in her yard, then her fence was not secure.
2. If his dogs were gone or leaving then why were her dogs still outside?
3. If his dogs were dangerous to people then why are the people out there with them and why didn't his dogs bother anybody else?
4. Hate to say it, but I detected a condescending tone from the neighbor/homeowners-president lady when she said she "I can tell you where these dogs came from". People with money tend to be biased about who lives in their neighborhood.
Would that also mean that if the dogs also got out of Dak's yard that his fence was not secure? C'mon the responsibility 1st lies on Dak to make sure his dogs are secure. They didn't go thru the fence the got out of Dak's yard first then when into her yard
I didn't say Dak was not responsible.
If somebody let's their 5 year old kid run into the street, it's their responsibility; however, it also the responsibility of drivers to NOT be speeding on a residential street.
Your comparison isn't valid the woman in question did not break any laws and was not charged with anything (to the best of my knowledge). If she did it would stand to reason they would have charged her with something or at the very least taken her dogs too. She was in compliance and Dak was not, especially since it has been reported he was warned twice about his dogs escaping, apparently through a door that did not close properly at his house, you would think Dak after being warned twice would have at the very least had that door fixed. I'm quite sure he never thought anything like this would happen but that doesn't take away his responsibility.
If you have a pool and the neighbor's kid gets in and8 drowns, you the pool owner are liable for not having the fence secured from people outside the fence.
Her story seems sketchy to me.
She did not seem concerned about her dogs on the 911 call when neighbors could be heard in the background asking if she needed help.
Did his dogs really get inside her fence or were they just trying to get in and she decided to try to get involved anyway instead of putting her dogs in the house?
Her dogs were definitely still outside as she described Dak's dogs leaving. I would want my dogs in the house asap.
If his dogs were all that dangerous then her dogs would be severely injured or dead but that does not appear to be the case.
Yes Dak has liability but the penalty is the issue.
In America you don't get the death penalty for speeding or even for robbing a bank if nobody was killed in the process.
Must be a pretty good story cause she wasn't charged with anythiing. The Dogs were Daks and they got loose, her dogs did no,t she tried to get the dogs apart (stupid) and had part of her finger bitten off by Dak's dog, the dogs were in her yard after they escaped Dak's yard after Dak had already been warned twice about this because his dogs got out twice before. Dak is the one at fault the women did nothing wrong