Melonfeud
I Copy!,,, er,,,I guess,,,ah,,,maybe.
- Messages
- 21,976
- Reaction score
- 33,150
There's an article posted up over on the Drudge report right now, apparently he'd requested a non- jury hearing and was scheduled to appear,
( I think it was for today?)
He's now scheduled to appear April 19th for trial after withdrawing his original request ,,,now here's the fuzzy part of the article that was the primary impetus for the thread,as it stated KRAFT had rejected a plea deal offered by the prosecution,in where charges would be dropped, if he would admit to the fact that he would likely have been convicted in a jury trial,,,now,
, I had to study some over that odd offer in my mind, as from what I know about the he courts when charges are dropped, you walk,no sweat with over the shoulder looking back,yet, if they were dropped" with prejudice"
They could be picked up later on down the road of life& be refiled( the article didn't state & I don't know about Florida courts)
If Kraft Rejected the plea because he didn't want it on his compiled background record? Makes no rational sense, as the arrest to begin with isn't ever going to be removed, does anyone have an idea ( other than he was merely delivering bibles to the whorehouse& is completely innocent) as to why the terms of the offered plea agreement would be rejected? What's the upside, he's gotta go to trial now, which is what he didn't want to go down to begin with,,,it's a little fuzzy to me.
Thanks Gang
( I think it was for today?)
He's now scheduled to appear April 19th for trial after withdrawing his original request ,,,now here's the fuzzy part of the article that was the primary impetus for the thread,as it stated KRAFT had rejected a plea deal offered by the prosecution,in where charges would be dropped, if he would admit to the fact that he would likely have been convicted in a jury trial,,,now,

They could be picked up later on down the road of life& be refiled( the article didn't state & I don't know about Florida courts)
If Kraft Rejected the plea because he didn't want it on his compiled background record? Makes no rational sense, as the arrest to begin with isn't ever going to be removed, does anyone have an idea ( other than he was merely delivering bibles to the whorehouse& is completely innocent) as to why the terms of the offered plea agreement would be rejected? What's the upside, he's gotta go to trial now, which is what he didn't want to go down to begin with,,,it's a little fuzzy to me.
Thanks Gang
