Stupid Draft Analysis Talk

eromeopolk

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,564
Reaction score
4,428
As we watch the 2019 Draft, lets consider the stupid draft analysis talk we will hear over the next 3 days. Hear is mine:

1. "Sometimes he disappears on tape" - Does that mean the player is a magician. It is usually given to describe defensive players not making plays consistently. What makes it so stupid is that a great player making great plays on defense is not going to keep doing it all game. The opposing coach will either stop running to that player's side of the field, triple team that player like Clemson did to Williams, or stop throwing to that player's side of the field (if DB). So it is a stupid analysis. Plus the football field measures 100 yards, and 53 1⁄3 yards wide. In addition, there are end zones extending another 10 yards past the goal lines to the "end lines", for a total length of 120 yards. Only 22 players are on the field at one time. So it is easy to so call "disappear" on about an acre of land. This is stupid draft analysis talk.
2. "QB can't see over the line" - This is stupid because OL are judge how well they bend their knees to get leverage on run plays and and get in position on pass protection. So a 6-5 OL suddenly becomes a 6-0 OL or less when he bends his knees to block. Also the QB then drops back 3-8 steps from the line or is in shotgun with a clear view of the line of scrimmage. It is a stupid analysis. Why do +6-5 QBs have a hard time making it in the NFL? This is stupid draft analysis talk.
3. "plant and explode" - This is stupid because E = mc2. You can't plant and explode. You will do one or the other. If you plant you are standing still to have no motion or not to be moved. When have you seen a tree or flower you planted explode? What happens before a football play is all the players SET then explode. Set means to place yourself in position to explode. That's why you hear before any foot race....Ready.....SET....Go. This is stupid draft analysis talk.

What other stupid draft analysis talk you think we will hear this weekend?
 

northerncowboynation

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,925
Reaction score
6,303
1 "Didn't see him on the ground".... of course you didn't, you didn't watch every single snap did you and your film guy probably didn't either... and the play is rarely on the ground
2 "Plays with a great burst off the edge" followed by "can get a little wide and over-run plays"... so does one cancel the other out?
3 "sees and reacts" followed by " sometimes doesn't wrap up"... doesn't sound like the correct reaction to me

Sometimes talk for the sake of talk is stupid draft analysis
 
Last edited:

northerncowboynation

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,925
Reaction score
6,303
As we watch the 2019 Draft, lets consider the stupid draft analysis talk we will hear over the next 3 days. Hear is mine:

1. "Sometimes he disappears on tape" - Does that mean the player is a magician. It is usually given to describe defensive players not making plays consistently. What makes it so stupid is that a great player making great plays on defense is not going to keep doing it all game. The opposing coach will either stop running to that player's side of the field, triple team that player like Clemson did to Williams, or stop throwing to that player's side of the field (if DB). So it is a stupid analysis. Plus the football field measures 100 yards, and 53 1⁄3 yards wide. In addition, there are end zones extending another 10 yards past the goal lines to the "end lines", for a total length of 120 yards. Only 22 players are on the field at one time. So it is easy to so call "disappear" on about an acre of land. This is stupid draft analysis talk.
2. "QB can't see over the line" - This is stupid because OL are judge how well they bend their knees to get leverage on run plays and and get in position on pass protection. So a 6-5 OL suddenly becomes a 6-0 OL or less when he bends his knees to block. Also the QB then drops back 3-8 steps from the line or is in shotgun with a clear view of the line of scrimmage. It is a stupid analysis. Why do +6-5 QBs have a hard time making it in the NFL? This is stupid draft analysis talk.
3. "plant and explode" - This is stupid because E = mc2. You can't plant and explode. You will do one or the other. If you plant you are standing still to have no motion or not to be moved. When have you seen a tree or flower you planted explode? What happens before a football play is all the players SET then explode. Set means to place yourself in position to explode. That's why you hear before any foot race....Ready.....SET....Go. This is stupid draft analysis talk.

What other stupid draft analysis talk you think we will hear this weekend?
Like it!!
 

Aerolithe_Lion

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,909
Reaction score
11,882
1. "Don't worry, he's a gamer." I got news for you, if he stinks up the practice field, he doesn't have a high ceiling even if he looks halfway decent on gameday. That's 50% effort and 50% lack of preparation.

2. "He looks like he was made in a lab, perfect football specimen." Tom Brady is the greatest QB who ever lived. Jerry Rice can't run a 4.5 to save his life. Jerome Bettis has more yards than 99% of the perfect specimens who ever stepped foot on the field. What a guy looks like in his underwear literally means nothing to the game of football.

3. The other day I heard a guy talking about a WR "Who had a knack for the ball." What other kind is there?
 

RodeoJake

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,905
Reaction score
6,873
How about (pick a player) taken by (pick a team) is gonna be scary going up against Tom Brady? That can be taken both ways.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
77,390
Reaction score
96,081
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
It depends how they are said in context. Some sound stupid if taken literally. Some you know what they are talking about.
And some are just plain stupid.

Here are a a few that pertain to this forum.

Dallas selects player X...Jerry sucks, this team is stupid, however,
Team X picks that player X...wow, what a great pick, why didn't Jerry take him.

How about...he had a bad combine 40 time but he has game speed. So during the game his 40 time is better? But we all know what that refers too. So is it really a stupid statement after all.
 

JayFord

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,547
Reaction score
21,229
The most annoying thing they talk about is “social media and what someone said on it”
 
Top