cern
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,900
- Reaction score
- 21,050
i should have prefaced my post with games missed due to injury. my bad.Zeke has missed twice as many games as Clowney the last three seasons
i should have prefaced my post with games missed due to injury. my bad.Zeke has missed twice as many games as Clowney the last three seasons
You can make excuses if you'd like.
I don't need to try again, Zeke has missed twice as many games as Clowney the last three seasons. And now there's a chance he'll miss more to start the season.
Paying two DEs $40M is soooooooo much better than paying a DE and a RB $35M, correct?
Neither makes sense to me.
Not only no, but hell no.Zeke and a mid round pick for Clowney. Who says no?
So how do you rank these?
Let Zeke walk
Lawrence and Zeke signed for $35
Lawrence and Clowney signed for $40
Also for everyone to know. Clowney can not negotiate a new contract until after the season. So we woulsn't need to extend him upon trading for him.
Yeah I have zero interest in having high priced, fully guaranteed Zeke for the next four years.Well if you trade Zeke and a mid round pick for Clowney, you are going to have to resign him most likely. So when you sign him isn't really important as in a year or two, you'd have two DEs making $20MM a year. This also doesn't take into account the fact Clowney might have a knee problem and a "motor" problem.
I'd rather just tag Zeke for a year or two and then let him walk. I have no interest in the other two scenarios.
And what is the prevailing reason why some dont want to pay Zeke?
I believe it is due to the salary cap hit and the position he plays.
Yes, probably both of those as well. But Im sure if he was an emmitt Smith type citizen and leader that most would have no issues.
Zeke and a mid round pick for Clowney. Who says no?