Would Romo have us at 5-0?

keysersoze

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,336
Reaction score
2,004
Yeah also except the Vikings were an actual dominant playoff team, while the Packers have a Swiss cheese defense full of hurt players that Dak did nothing against until it was garbage time.
Romo is going to the Ring of Honor because he was good, maybe you don’t know what it is but it has nothing to do with team accomplishments. Dak is going to the Arena League because he’s bad.
JUST SAY “NO” TO DRUGS
 

Romo_To_Dez

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,329
Reaction score
14,992
Yeah also except the Vikings were an actual dominant playoff team, while the Packers have a Swiss cheese defense full of hurt players that Dak did nothing against until it was garbage time.
Romo is going to the Ring of Honor because he was good, maybe you don’t know what it is but it has nothing to do with team accomplishments. Dak is going to the Arena League because he’s bad.

You think that calling the Vikings a dominant playoff team helps out Romo's defense for losing that game. The narrative was that Dak couldn't beat a good team and the Packers were included as a good team this season. Lol Romo couldn't even make the score closer in "garbage time" games against ugly losses like 44-6 to Philly and 34-3 to the Vikings. :lmao2::lmao2:

Romo not only lost in blow out games just as ugly as the game that the Cowboys had last Sunday against the Packers. But was a part of Cowboys teams who had epic collapses in games that we lead by double digits. Including to the Lions where Romo's pick 6s gave the Lions life to comeback and beat the Cowboys. And Including to Matt Flynn where Romo played great in the first half of the game. yet ended the game with 2 INTs to cap off a Packers comeback win. Because Garrett wanted it to be the Romo keep throwing show, instead of running the ball with Murray up 26-3 show. :lmao::lmao:

If the Vikings were a dominant playoff team then it shows that Romo couldn't beat dominant playoff teams for most of his career and had ten years to get to the NFC Championship game and couldn't do it. :rolleyes:
 

Super_Kazuya

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
9,113
You think that calling the Vikings a dominant playoff team helps out Romo's defense for losing that game. The narrative was that Dak couldn't beat a good team and the Packers were included as a good team this season. Lol Romo couldn't even make the score closer in "garbage time" games against ugly losses like 44-6 to Philly and 34-3 to the Vikings. :lmao2::lmao2:

Romo not only lost in blow out games just as ugly as the game that the Cowboys had last Sunday against the Packers. But was a part of Cowboys teams who had epic collapses in games that we lead by double digits. Including to the Lions where Romo's pick 6s gave the Lions life to comeback and beat the Cowboys. And Including to Matt Flynn where Romo played great in the first half of the game. yet ended the game with 2 INTs to cap off a Packers comeback win. Because Garrett wanted it to be the Romo keep throwing show, instead of running the ball with Murray up 26-3 show. :lmao::lmao:

If the Vikings were a dominant playoff team then it shows that Romo couldn't beat dominant playoff teams for most of his career and had ten years to get to the NFC Championship game and couldn't do it. :rolleyes:
LOL, you are one bizarre troll. The idea that it matters one whit about “coming back” to make the score look respectable in garbage time shows just how mentally ill Dak slobberers are. They so desperately want to somehow make Dak’s meaningless stat padding count in a game where he was awful.
Cherry picking meaningless regular season games out of Romo’s career means nothing; if Dak plays as long as Romo did then over the course of a decade he is going to have a couple of games like that. Except Dak isn’t going to have a long career... when the OL dries up he’ll be gone. :rolleyes:
 

shabazz

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,810
Reaction score
31,029
The very fact that the ghost of Antonio Ramiro Romo still haunts this forum is proof enough that he hasn’t been supplanted. Now Mahomes or Wilson would have never let Romos name be brought again.

How that “agenda” thing going?........yeah, not so well. Gonna have to come up with another card to play
 

Super_Kazuya

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
9,113
The very fact that the ghost of Antonio Ramiro Romo still haunts this forum is proof enough that he hasn’t been supplanted. Now Mahomes or Wilson would have never let Romos name be brought again.

How that “agenda” thing going?........yeah, not so well. Gonna have to come up with another card to play
I did a Google trend search that revealed that the mention of the word “Romo” spiked on this site by 295% following the week of Dak’s stinkers... almost all of them interjected by frustrated Dak slobberers.
 

Romo_To_Dez

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,329
Reaction score
14,992
LOL, you are one bizarre troll. The idea that it matters one whit about “coming back” to make the score look respectable in garbage time shows just how mentally ill Dak slobberers are. They so desperately want to somehow make Dak’s meaningless stat padding count in a game where he was awful.
Cherry picking meaningless regular season games out of Romo’s career means nothing; if Dak plays as long as Romo did then over the course of a decade he is going to have a couple of games like that. Except Dak isn’t going to have a long career... when the OL dries up he’ll be gone. :rolleyes:

I'm just pointing out all of the bad games that Romo has had. You call Romo's regular season bad games "Meaningless" when the one against Philly was for the division where Romo did nothing in the 44-6 loss. And 34-3 game to the VIkings is still worse than an October loss to the Packers, because Romo's offense didn't show up in a playoff game. Where at least the Cowboys have a chance to turn it around. Here you are talking about Romo's bad games being "Meaningless" because it was in the regular season, while focusing on an bad October game that still has a lot of season to go.

Still not as bad a Romo's teams getting blown out in meaningful games against Philly and the Vikings. Romo's stats didn't count for what it mattered the most and that's winning a Superbowl and getting the Cowboys to the NFC Championship game. Still have those games where he helped choked away double digit leads. You can it meaningless, while acting like any bad regular season games the Cowboys had with Dak as QB means everything. :rolleyes:
 

408Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,785
Reaction score
6,219
I find it laughable when people say Dak needs this or that to succeed. It tends to be the same people that bemoan the fact that Romo didn't get a shot with Zeke and ignore the fact that the 2016 team was built for Romo except when they want to complain about it.
 

Super_Kazuya

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
9,113
I'm just pointing out all of the bad games that Romo has had. You call Romo's regular season bad games "Meaningless" when the one against Philly was for the division where Romo did nothing in the 44-6 loss. And 34-3 game to the VIkings is still worse than an October loss to the Packers, because Romo's offense didn't show up in a playoff game. Where at least the Cowboys have a chance to turn it around. Here you are talking about Romo's bad games being "Meaningless" because it was in the regular season, while focusing on an bad October game that still has a lot of season to go.

Still not as bad a Romo's teams getting blown out in meaningful games against Philly and the Vikings. Romo's stats didn't count for what it mattered the most and that's winning a Superbowl and getting the Cowboys to the NFC Championship game. Still have those games where he helped choked away double digit leads. You can it meaningless, while acting like any bad regular season games the Cowboys had with Dak as QB means everything. :rolleyes:
Nice troll, The meaningless regular season games I referred to are the Lions and Packers, but yes pretend that you didn’t mention those and make yourself look dumber than you already do.
And yes, you’re pointing out bad games over a ten year career, meanwhile Dak has only played three seasons and hasn’t accomplished anything either (except for being a considerably worse QB who can’t function without All-Pros surrounding him) so I’m afraid criticizing his regular season stinkers will have to do for now... until the team can drag him to the playoffs again and he can fail. Maybe then you will be on your hands and knees in front of the TV, praying that Dak can close the score from 51-10 to 51-17. Since garbage time is weirdly such a special time for Dak slobberers now.:rolleyes:
 

Romo_To_Dez

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,329
Reaction score
14,992
Nice troll, The meaningless regular season games I referred to are the Lions and Packers, but yes pretend that you didn’t mention those and make yourself look dumber than you already do.
And yes, you’re pointing out bad games over a ten year career, meanwhile Dak has only played three seasons and hasn’t accomplished anything either (except for being a considerably worse QB who can’t function without All-Pros surrounding him) so I’m afraid criticizing his regular season stinkers will have to do for now... until the team can drag him to the playoffs again and he can fail. Maybe then you will be on your hands and knees in front of the TV, praying that Dak can close the score from 51-10 to 51-17. Since garbage time is weirdly such a special time for Dak slobberers now.:rolleyes:

"QB who can't function without All-Pros surrounding him" You must be speaking of Romo since according to Romo fans he isn't good enough to win a Superbowl or get to the NFC Championship game without an All Pro team or the 2016 to 2019 Cowboys rosters. And since Romo fans are the ones who insist that Romo had a team filled with bums every year of his career and that it's everyone's fault except for Romo's for the Cowboys not winning a Superbowl with him as QB.

You refer to the Lions and Packers games as meaningless while still dwelling on the bad regular season game with Dak as QB, acting like it meant more and was worse than Romo throwing pick 6s and letting the Lions comeback and win a game. So, we have Romo contributing to losing a double digit lead and loss, something that Dak has never done.

And Romo's teams getting blown out in games that was more meaningful than last Sunday's game against the Packers. As if Romo didn't also have awful games in his first 2 or 3 years starting. Like an awful game against the Bills where he threw for 5 INTs against a bad Bills team.

It's the Anti-Dak crowd that's praying for the team to fail with Dak, otherwise winning a Superbowl or getting to the NFC Championship game with Dak as , would have more Romo fans come out and complaining about how he was treated so unfairly and should of have this team. :rolleyes::muttley:
 

Super_Kazuya

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
9,113
"QB who can't function without All-Pros surrounding him" You must be speaking of Romo since according to Romo fans he isn't good enough to win a Superbowl or get to the NFC Championship game without an All Pro team or the 2016 to 2019 Cowboys rosters. And since Romo fans are the ones who insist that Romo had a team filled with bums every year of his career and that it's everyone's fault except for Romo's for the Cowboys not winning a Superbowl with him as QB.

You refer to the Lions and Packers games as meaningless while still dwelling on the bad regular season game with Dak as QB, acting like it meant more and was worse than Romo throwing pick 6s and letting the Lions comeback and win a game. So, we have Romo contributing to losing a double digit lead and loss, something that Dak has never done.

And Romo's teams getting blown out in games that was more meaningful than last Sunday's game against the Packers. As if Romo didn't also have awful games in his first 2 or 3 years starting. Like an awful game against the Bills where he threw for 5 INTs against a bad Bills team.

It's the Anti-Dak crowd that's praying for the team to fail with Dak, otherwise winning a Superbowl or getting to the NFC Championship game with Dak as , would have more Romo fans come out and complaining about how he was treated so unfairly and should of have this team. :rolleyes::muttley:
You must be the most clueless football fan on this board. First you think it’s better to rack up a bunch of points and yards in garbage time as if it’s somehow better than not... it’s still a loss. Now you are trying to say it’s worse to give up a lead and lose, “something Dak has never done”, rather than play like garbage throwing three interceptions and falling behind 31-3... either way, it’s still a loss.
I think I understand Dak slobberers better now, they literally aren’t even watching the games. It’s like fantasy football, but Dak is the only player in the league and he scores points to try to measure up to the Romo scoreboard in the sky. The scoreboard representing the mental block every Dak slobberer possesses to where they are obsessed with a long-retired quarterback...
 

G2

Taco Engineer
Messages
24,444
Reaction score
26,197
Some of you guys have this warped and disturbing obsession with slobbering.

I am truly thankful to not be in your circle.

;)
 

Blackspider214

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,667
Reaction score
15,497
The very fact that the ghost of Antonio Ramiro Romo still haunts this forum is proof enough that he hasn’t been supplanted. Now Mahomes or Wilson would have never let Romos name be brought again.

How that “agenda” thing going?........yeah, not so well. Gonna have to come up with another card to play

Or this fanbase is just stupid. When Dak wins another playoff game, he will have accomplished every single thing that overrated bum did in his decade long stint here. Just because ignorant fans bring up Romo does not mean anything.
 

Chuck 54

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,075
Reaction score
12,052
Tony Romo was a stat guy who never won squat. Make excuses if you want, but he was never a winner. That’s indisputable looking at his playoff appearances and record.

Dak has done no better in his short career. Dak has improved, but he hasn’t won squat either. I like and support Dak because I think he has the leadership, big moment play to get there, but he’s basically done nothing yet.

But those who think Romo was magic need to look at how his teams with great records and first round byes collapsed. So many fans don’t want to hear about the little victories or records, only pointing to playoff wins with Garrett and Dak. So look at the same thing with Romo and stop bronzing his jewels. He won nothing for Dallas, never even appearing in a big game.
 

Super_Kazuya

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
9,113
Or this fanbase is just stupid. When Dak wins another playoff game, he will have accomplished every single thing that overrated bum did in his decade long stint here. Just because ignorant fans bring up Romo does not mean anything.
When is Dak going to win another playoff game, troll? Is that kind of like “Dak will be signing his extension any day now” going on six months now? Dak slobberers are bad with specifics, they just throw things out and hope they’ll eventually be right.
Back under your rock you go, Grandpa.
 
Top