He is a UFA. Unless he is tagged, he won't hold outAnd to think we could have used the 4th pick in the draft on a more important position and taken Henry in the 2nd round?
Will Henry hold out for 16 million a year?
Looking back, I think Buckner would have been the best pick of the guys we would have drafted at #4Yeah we could’ve drafted that headache Jaylon Ramsey...wonder how that would’ve went lol.
Now that one is interesting.Looking back, I think Buckner would have been the best pick of the guys we would have drafted at #4
I don’t think that’s a Zeke thing. He was given that green light from the staff in order to preserve him for the playoffs. I have no problem with it because Pollard is a beast.I would rather have a RB who doesn't have to take himself out every other play because he's out of shape and can't handle the workload. I would understand if he were 54 like me, but he isn't.
I would rather have a RB who doesn't have to take himself out every other play because he's out of shape and can't handle the workload. I would understand if he were 54 like me, but he isn't.
Yeah I get the Henry love but there’s about 5 backs I’d take over him. He works for that system.Henry is a fantastic runner but its really about the blocking. The lanes that are being opened and allowing that freight train to get started are amazing much like the Dallas line in 2014 for Demarco Murray. Murray was a smaller version of Henry IMO. He also needed a few steps to get moving and then he was tough to catch or bring down. I’d take either but I think with an average line, which is what dallas was last year, Zeke can still be effective. Not sure Henry could do that.
I always favor DL if all things are equal. QB is usually the only exception to that. After Bosa, we were in a bad spot. If you follow the NBA, its like there drafts where you pick 4th in a 3 player draft. Thought 4 was a bit rich an Elliott or a Ramsey. I thought both were top 10 caliber, but not quite top 5.Now that one is interesting.
I also think it’s important to remember that we were building around a 35 year old Romo with a bad back. They went for the running back.
Id be interested to see where they’d go if they weren’t trying to draft around Romo but around a younger quarterback.
Yeah I get the Henry love but there’s about 5 backs I’d take over him. He works for that system.
Which is exactly what I lobbied for in 2016.And to think we could have used the 4th pick in the draft on a more important position and taken Henry in the 2nd round?
Will Henry hold out for 16 million a year?
Murray was there at least his Rookie season . Besides he would have flourished here in this offense much earlier.It has taken Henry a few years to really get going, this place would have already ripped him to peices before he got to this point of productivity.
The Romo point is something alot of people forget. And its also another example of the FO's short sightedness. 4-12 without Romo exposed alot of weaknessess that team had. Instead of building those weakness, they looked to support they player that gave us maybe one or shots. "Super Bowl or Bust with Romo" is a huge waste of a top 5 pickNow that one is interesting.
I also think it’s important to remember that we were building around a 35 year old Romo with a bad back. They went for the running back.
Id be interested to see where they’d go if they weren’t trying to draft around Romo but around a younger quarterback.