Philip Rivers released

gjkoeppen

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,703
Reaction score
3,327
If he would take Rush Money i'm good with it.

He couldn't even if he wanted to because his veteran minimum is more than what Rush makes. Rivers is guaranteed over 1 mil a year as a vet min with 10 or more seasons in. It would be a waste of a roster spot to sign Rivers anyways. He has a very bad habit of throwing picks in the red zone.
.
 

Kingofholland

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,896
Reaction score
6,309
Bad 2019 for Rivers but the prior season was very good. Don't know if he's truly in decline or was an off season that was a product of one of the worst lines in the NFL. Rivers is the perfect stop gap QB to get a promising rookie ready or a team without a long term solution at QB needing to upgrade.
 

GimmeTheBall!

Junior College Transfer
Messages
36,392
Reaction score
16,982
Not good enough for starter money anymore.
Not sure if he would want to be a back up, He already moved his family to Florida, nor sure if he would want to move again, try to get on in a team in Florida or retire.
Blimey! That borders on family abuse, moving his family from SoCal to Florida.
 

Floatyworm

The Labeled One
Messages
21,403
Reaction score
19,365
Signing Phillip Rivers would be like adopting the Brady Bunch. How appealing is that? :laugh:
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
Well the Dak fan boys love Daks passing yards so they should love Rivers too since he finished 4th in passing behind 1. Jameis, 2. Dak, 3. Goff, 4. Rivers. Elite production...

Passing yards wouldnt be a big deal, but trolls like you used to say Dak wasnt good enough because he had average stats. Only threw for 200 something yards and couldnt throw deep, light it up, pass for a lot of TD's, ect......ect....

So now when Dak proves you dead wrong, we love to throw it in your face and laugh.

But the truth is that the Dak supporters have been telling you for years how much it was winning that was the most important thing.

Only to have clowns like you tell us that it was a TEAM STAT and didnt matter.

But wait, we just went 8-8 and Dak lead the #1 offense in football throwing for almost 5000 yards. So clowns like you are completely contradicting yourselves.

All of sudden after 3 years, stats dont count and wins are important. LOL

You are pathetic and laughable.
 

OmerV

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,916
Reaction score
22,440
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I don't think you understand what you think you said. You certainly don't mean what you are saying and let's be real, YOU are the one who questioned the dink and dunk. Basically you went on the offense to defend a guy who can't win when a game is handed to him, if he only does his job minimally. Stats have a purpose as long as they are used in context. Yards don't win games, TDs do. So there is a real correlation between TDs in a game and the team winning.

And now you want to continue with the whitewash trying to get someone to disprove your points. What good is 30TDs at the end of the year if you finish 8-8 and out of the play-offs?

If you have a point to make, I'm listening.

lol - to you stats are important if they suit your purpose. You say he doesn’t score TDs, and once it is proven he does, then suddenly TDs don’t matter.

As for it only being wins that matter, I see that is only the case when talking about 2019, but you have no problem ignoring that the Cowboys have averaged 10 wins per season over Daks career. I also see you don’t mind ignoring that wins and losses aren’t only about the QB.

face it, you selectively promote or ignore things based on what fits your narrative
 

garyo1954

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,704
Reaction score
4,470
Passing yards wouldnt be a big deal, but trolls like you used to say Dak wasnt good enough because he had average stats. Only threw for 200 something yards and couldnt throw deep, light it up, pass for a lot of TD's, ect......ect....

So now when Dak proves you dead wrong, we love to throw it in your face and laugh.

I don't know whether to agree or not. Stats without context are useless. Highs and lows even out over a season and you're left with no real means of understanding what happened in each game. And while season stats are great for accolades and personal highs/satisfaction, they mean very little in the grand scheme of winning and losing. So I went on a witch hunt.....

QBs who have thrown the Most Passes in a Game without throwing a TD.

At the top of the list is Dan Marino (38 of 60, 389, 0 TDs and 3 picks and Joe Montana (33 of 60 for 441, 0 TDs, 3 picks).
Matthew Stafford most yards in a game without a TD (37 of 56, 443, 0 TDs, 1 pick). It happens to all of 'em.

Of the top 100 games where a QB threw more than 47 passes and 0 TDs, there were only 7 wins and 3 ties.

If you look at post season, Steve Young went 32 of 65 for 328, 0 TD, and 2 picks. Lost to the Packer 27-17.

So it seems no matter how you slice it, if the QB position isn't producing points, you have a 90% chance of losing on any given Sunday.

(Dak, the highest ranked Cowboy, checks in at #201, 25 of 45, 0 TDs, a loss to the Giants (19-20) in 2016. His first game.
 

Birch_Wood

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,654
Reaction score
1,579
I tell you that ol man rivers, he must know sumin, but dont say nuthin, he just keeps rolling along,
 

Floatyworm

The Labeled One
Messages
21,403
Reaction score
19,365
I tell you that ol man rivers, he must know sumin, but dont say nuthin, he just keeps rolling along,

I got a feeling that dude is gonna play until he can't walk....nor anyone signs him. I can see him holding a clip board for years as a backup...just to keep the checks coming in....to feed his 8 kids.
 
Top