Hawkeye0202
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 23,303
- Reaction score
- 42,919
He was the first to jump on the Slater band wagon. The issue is the guy is 6’3. I just heard him on Cowturd and his justification for drafting Lance over Fields makes no sense.I don't get why Jeremiah always has to get so cute. Not that it's impossible, but Fields as the 4th QB off the board and Slater > Sewell just seems like giving himself the opportunity to say "I told you so." There's little justification to it.
He was the first to jump on the Slater band wagon. The issue is the guy is 6’3. I just heard him on Cowturd and his justification for drafting Lance over Fields makes no sense.
LOL .....some were saying 10 is too high for Slater but I honestly think we'll see a few surprises of players rising and dropping by the time they're all evaluated by NFL experts/scouts/coaches/GMs
With Roseman? I wouldnt put anything past them.To be honest, I've read/heard a few scouts actually like Slater better than Sewell. So expecting him to go before Sewell is not that much of a reach. But I will agree he's waaaay off on the Eagles pick IMO. No way in hell the Eagles ARE NOT taking either Smith or Chase, no way.
One other thing, keep an eye on the Lions. Hiring Campbell IMO is more about keeping Stafford and get him some weapons. Don't be surprised if they take Pitt.
A couple of draft nicks have rated Slater slightly higher but they all say there is no way an NFL franchise would draft Slater over Sewell because of the latter’s traits. Then again Cleveland drafted Baker over Josh Allen so you never know. I will say this if trades happen I could see the players ending up on those teams. The Cowboys trading their whole draft to get to the second pick could work.To be honest, I've read/heard a few scouts actually like Slater better than Sewell. So expecting him to go before Sewell is not that much of a reach. But I will agree he's waaaay off on the Eagles pick IMO. No way in hell the Eagles ARE NOT taking either Smith or Chase, no way.
One other thing, keep an eye on the Lions. Hiring Campbell IMO is more about keeping Stafford and get him some weapons. Don't be surprised if they take Pitt.
To be honest, I've read/heard a few scouts actually like Slater better than Sewell. So expecting him to go before Sewell is not that much of a reach. But I will agree he's waaaay off on the Eagles pick IMO. No way in hell the Eagles ARE NOT taking either Smith or Chase, no way.
One other thing, keep an eye on the Lions. Hiring Campbell IMO is more about keeping Stafford and get him some weapons. Don't be surprised if they take Pitt.
I don't get why Jeremiah always has to get so cute. Not that it's impossible, but Fields as the 4th QB off the board and Slater > Sewell just seems like giving himself the opportunity to say "I told you so." There's little justification to it.
I disagree. I don’t think Slater is anywhere near the prospect that Sewell is.I have Slater over Sewell as well. Sewell isn't some can't miss prospect and is highly overrated. He wouldn't have been the first OT taken last year
Slater manhandled Chase Young. Is a stud. Yes is 6'3 but built for war. You guys are dead wrong about him.I disagree. I don’t think Slater is anywhere near the prospect that Sewell is.
To be honest, I've read/heard a few scouts actually like Slater better than Sewell. So expecting him to go before Sewell is not that much of a reach. But I will agree he's waaaay off on the Eagles pick IMO. No way in hell the Eagles ARE NOT taking either Smith or Chase, no way.
One other thing, keep an eye on the Lions. Hiring Campbell IMO is more about keeping Stafford and get him some weapons. Don't be surprised if they take Pitt.