Dak would have put up 40 Pts on Chiefs & Tampa with a Win

12+88=7 said:

Do even remember that game?

So, the interception with 27 seconds before the half and the fumble on the first play in the 3rd quarter to give Seattle the ball at the 5 yard line had no bearing on this game.

Prescott handed Seattle 14 points in a 35 second stretch, but it wasn't a problem.

Click to expand...

Dak_Attack_09 said:

Dak was averaging 40 pts a game this season?

Click to expand...

Dak_Attack_09 said:

Pathetic to see overhyped Allen & chocking Rodgers lose in a such manner when they had so many opportunities to score and win the game. I was pulling for A-Rod, but I knew that once he didn’t convert the Brady’s T.O. in 2nd half into TDs the game was over.

For the Bills I have never seen a Defensive minded HC play such soft defense and letting the opposing team do whatever they wanted and you sit back and watch with zone defense.

Allen has really low football IQ, the motions and audibles he made throughout the games didn’t attack Cheifs constant blitzes. He doesn’t seem to read spacing or coverage at all, and how an offense should attack it.


If Dak was in command of Bill’s offense DIGGS & BEASLEY would have had 200 yards & 2 TDs each and walked out with a beatdown of Chiefs.

Click to expand...

ABQCOWBOY said:

The more I read, the more I suspect that we are all getting trolled with all of these threads. Seriously, what other excuse could there be?

Click to expand...

Jake said:

Click to expand...

America's Cowboy said:

Every QB throws an INT or commits a fumble, but Dak doesn't do it that often. He's one of the best at taking care of the ball. Certainly much better than most past Cowboys QBs, yet some of the most turnover-prone Cowboys QBs got paid. Why not Dak? I'm not saying he should get paid what he demands or even what the market demands. I say somewhere in the low $30s (millions) should work just fine.

If Dak had a good Defense, those 31 points scored at Seattle would have been enough, even with Dak's 2 turnovers. You don't throw for 472 yards and 3 TDs with a chance to win the game @ SEATTLE by being a bad or sucky QB.

Click to expand...

Dak_Attack_09 said:

What about this playoff game?

Click to expand...

America's Cowboy said:

What do you propose? If to keep Dak, at what price? If not Dak, then what?

Click to expand...

12+88=7 said:

Do even remember that game?

So, the interception with 27 seconds before the half and the fumble on the first play in the 3rd quarter to give Seattle the ball at the 5 yard line had no bearing on this game.

Prescott handed Seattle 14 points in a 35 second stretch, but it wasn't a problem.

Click to expand...

CATCH17 said:

The Cowboys offense usually sucks at scoring early on and we know other teams will jump out on us so he would probably put up a lot of nice stats in a game where we get throttled by the opposing offense.

Now if we played an offense that was high powered and had a decent defense then he'd play to that level as well and his numbers would drop considerably.

Click to expand...

PAPPYDOG said:

Only way Dak scored 40 pts is if we were losing at the start of the 4th Quarter 75-10..

Click to expand...

Dak_Attack_09 said:

Pathetic to see overhyped Allen & chocking Rodgers lose in a such manner when they had so many opportunities to score and win the game. I was pulling for A-Rod, but I knew that once he didn’t convert the Brady’s T.O. in 2nd half into TDs the game was over.

For the Bills I have never seen a Defensive minded HC play such soft defense and letting the opposing team do whatever they wanted and you sit back and watch with zone defense.

Allen has really low football IQ, the motions and audibles he made throughout the games didn’t attack Cheifs constant blitzes. He doesn’t seem to read spacing or coverage at all, and how an offense should attack it.


If Dak was in command of Bill’s offense DIGGS & BEASLEY would have had 200 yards & 2 TDs each and walked out with a beatdown of Chiefs.

Click to expand...

Dak_Attack_09 said:

Pathetic to see overhyped Allen & chocking Rodgers lose in a such manner when they had so many opportunities to score and win the game. I was pulling for A-Rod, but I knew that once he didn’t convert the Brady’s T.O. in 2nd half into TDs the game was over.

For the Bills I have never seen a Defensive minded HC play such soft defense and letting the opposing team do whatever they wanted and you sit back and watch with zone defense.

Allen has really low football IQ, the motions and audibles he made throughout the games didn’t attack Cheifs constant blitzes. He doesn’t seem to read spacing or coverage at all, and how an offense should attack it.


If Dak was in command of Bill’s offense DIGGS & BEASLEY would have had 200 yards & 2 TDs each and walked out with a beatdown of Chiefs.

Click to expand...

12+88=7 said:

Forget everything. This is just about that game and game situation that we are discussing here.

The last thing you need is a turnover deep in your own end with just 27 seconds before the half when the score is 16-15. Then that mistake is compounded by a turnover on the first play of the 3rd quarter.

It is an enormous swing in the game. Now you are in catch up mode because of those errors. Without those two plays I believe Dallas would have won that game.

I only have an issue with you saying Prescott was not the problem in the Seattle game. Those two plays were the major reason for the loss.

Your response will be that the defense was the major reason for the loss. Dallas with that defense still(I believe) would have won the game minus those two turnovers.

Click to expand...