Even more telling was his take on the Cardinals game. Basically dismissed Weeden's "performance" as a non-factor and said it was the Cowboys' inability to run against the all-world Cardinals defense that was the real factor. But that's why you gotta love football -- in the end, it doesn't matter what any of these biased jokers write, they still have to play the games. If the Cardinals are truly the best team in the NFC like King insists, they'll be there at the end. I'm not holding my breath. I personally feel there are a number of teams in the NFC that would beat the Cards (Stanton, Palmer or otherwise) if the playoffs started today -- the Cowboys, Packers, Seattle, and Eagles.
I had to listen to Brian Dawkins on the Mike and Mike show the other day and he was just as biased, not just for his Eagles, but against the Cowboys. When asked who were the biggest threats in the NFC, he put his Eagles first over the Cardinals and Packers because of the Cards and Packers' inability to run the ball effectively, something he said is really important this time of year. Um Brian, how about that team over there with the most dominant rushing attack in the NFL today? You know, the Cowboys? Not one mention, not one. Take it with a grain of salt, reality wins out in the end.
