How does David Irving produce next year?

Trouty · May 23, 2017

radioactivecowboy88 said:
Well I guess things have changed with Irving testing positive for PEDs....

Still going with my 7-11 vote

Closer to the 7, now, tho

CowboyRoy · May 23, 2017

Gameover said:
Ignored

Are you going to ignore the recent failed drug test as well?

CowboyRoy · May 23, 2017

Trouty said:
Still going with my 7-11 vote Closer to the 7, now, tho

Ah, so now you appear to also be laughing at 12-15 sacks for Irving.

Trouty · May 23, 2017

CowboyRoy said:
Ah, so now you appear to also be laughing at 12-15 sacks for Irving.

Wut? I appear to be... like, wut?

Genuinely confused why a) you chose me to reply to and b) how you arrived at that particular conclusion.

CowboyRoy · May 23, 2017

Trouty said:
Wut? I appear to be... like, wut?

Genuinely confused why a) you chose me to reply to and b) how you arrived at that particular conclusion.

I laughed at someone with a laughing face on this thread when he predicted 12-15 sacks. He responded by saying he was ignoring me. You liked that post where he said he was ignoring me. Now I see your prediction has dropped from 7-11 to more like 7. Which would be around what I would say. So I gathered that you ALSO are now laughing at someone predicting 12-15 sacks for Irving. :thumbup:

ErikWilliamsHeadSlap · May 23, 2017

In a cup...he will produce in a cup.

cowboyschmps3 · May 23, 2017

Where the being suspended option?

NorthwestDallas40 · May 23, 2017

So pissed at this guy (pun intended)

JoeKing · May 23, 2017

4 game suspension... he'll be limited yet again

Trouty · May 23, 2017

CowboyRoy said:
I laughed at someone with a laughing face on this thread when he predicted 12-15 sacks. He responded by saying he was ignoring me. You liked that post where he said he was ignoring me. Now I see your prediction has dropped from 7-11 to more like 7. Which would be around what I would say. So I gathered that you ALSO are now laughing at someone predicting 12-15 sacks for Irving.

No, I just liked his post. Sometimes I just "like" posts for whatever reason, sometimes no other reason than to make a poster happy. I imagine I was just appreciating his optimism. Sometimes, well a lot of times, I like posts I don't agree with but they offer an interesting other side to an argument.

I originally voted 7-11 (check for yourself, bubba), and my first reply today stayed the same. I thought closer to ten, originally, now it's closer to 7.

And, no, I'm not laughing. Irving getting suspended and it's ramifications are not a laughing matter, nor is any sort of lack of success for my Boys. Clearly that isn't the case for some here.

Does this adequately answer your wonderment?

slomoxn · May 23, 2017

Well, he is facing a 4 game suspension right now for endorsing a supplement that is apparently a PED. As per NFL network Sirius.

Elusive6thRing · May 23, 2017

Very productive at taking PEDs.

Eric_Boyer · May 23, 2017

CowboyRoy said:
I laughed at someone with a laughing face on this thread when he predicted 12-15 sacks. He responded by saying he was ignoring me. You liked that post where he said he was ignoring me. Now I see your prediction has dropped from 7-11 to more like 7. Which would be around what I would say. So I gathered that you ALSO are now laughing at someone predicting 12-15 sacks for Irving.

you seem kind of unhinged here.

Trouty · May 23, 2017

Eric_Boyer said:
you seem kind of unhinged here.

Yeah, I was confused, Eric

LocimusPrime · May 24, 2017

LocimusPrime said:
im waiting for the day, a cowboys defensive end gets 9 sacks in the season...double digits is a dream ( a very good dream, but still a dream).

I voted 0-5 sacks, and I'm sticking with it. I hope he doesn't get suspended for long. This is what we get for looking for gems, scrounging around for players, and taking chances on high risk high upside guys.

Dim sum you win, dim sum you lose

CowboyRoy · May 24, 2017

Trouty said:
No, I just liked his post. Sometimes I just "like" posts for whatever reason, sometimes no other reason than to make a poster happy. I imagine I was just appreciating his optimism. Sometimes, well a lot of times, I like posts I don't agree with but they offer an interesting other side to an argument.

I originally voted 7-11 (check for yourself, bubba), and my first reply today stayed the same. I thought closer to ten, originally, now it's closer to 7.

And, no, I'm not laughing. Irving getting suspended and it's ramifications are not a laughing matter, nor is any sort of lack of success for my Boys. Clearly that isn't the case for some here.

Does this adequately answer your wonderment?

You like posts that you dont agree with? I really have no answer to that then just that you should then not be shocked when people are confused by that.

Trouty · May 24, 2017

CowboyRoy said:
You like posts that you dont agree with? I really have no answer to that then just that you should then not be shocked when people are confused by that.

If it's well thought out, sure. All the time. I have an open mind, bro. Open your mind a little and embrace other's opinions, even if they don't mesh with yours. It will help you grow.

But as I already said, I liked that persons post because of his enthusiasm and optimism. And his "ignore" response was funny,

Why are you so hooked on this "like" deal?

How does David Irving produce next year?

How does David "McQueen" Irving produce next year?

0-5 sacks 0-15 TKL 0-2 TFL

5-7 sacks 15-30 TKL 2-5 TFL

7-11 sacks 30-40 TKL 5-8 TFL

11+ sacks 40+ TKL 8+ TFL

Trouty

Kellen Moore baby

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member

Trouty

Kellen Moore baby

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member

ErikWilliamsHeadSlap

Well-Known Member

cowboyschmps3

Well-Known Member

NorthwestDallas40

rpatricc

JoeKing

Diehard

Trouty

Kellen Moore baby

slomoxn

Well-Known Member

Elusive6thRing

Well-Known Member

Eric_Boyer

Well-Known Member

Trouty

Kellen Moore baby

LocimusPrime

Well-Known Member

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member

Trouty

Kellen Moore baby