Zeke's Fumble

TwoDeep3

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,389
Reaction score
17,212
I am biased. Let's get that out there up front.

I watched the replay of the fumble by Zeke, as everyone who watched the game did. I disagree with the comments made about clear evidence.

Now let's also get this out of the way. I think it is a huge mistake for the broadcast to have an official second guessing the call. There is a reason baseball does not allow replays of balls and strikes to occur on the stadium big screens. My belief is this exacerbates the fans angst over missed calls. Especially when the "expert" in the booth seems to either get it wrong, or disagrees with the eye in the sky that is the ultimate arbiter.

To me (remember the bias) Zeke's elbow was down. The "expert" suggested the ball was moving, yet - again, to me - it did not move until he hit the ground. The "expert" said he did not have control. Yet the ball was still in the crook of his arm until he touched down.

I could be wrong. Most here that know me can point to those times with ease. But in that scrum, I don't believe the refs had enough information to make that call to begin with.

I also think the completely asinine thought process of reversing the call leaves out a significant aspect. The fact in a scrum, the refs don't have a clear cut view, and therefore cannot make an accurate call. The refs could not possibly see that fumble from any angle they had. So the automatic cannot reverse the call has a flaw that the refs cannot say they just didn't see it correctly.

In Zeke's defense, he usually is really good at covering up. But he, like every other ball carrier will occasionally put it on the ground. I think this was a bang bang play and there was no ref that could clearly see the ball come out and whether is was down or it was a strip.

I surely think the "expert" is just winging it, and find this aspect of the game as a way to stir up the viewing audience. In other words I believe this is a stupid idea.

But again, I believe Zeke was down and there was no clear cut view by the officials on the field to make the initial call, and the "expert" was incorrect in his elbow touching before the ball slipped out.

Just my opinion.
 

CWR

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,586
Reaction score
34,309
I am biased. Let's get that out there up front.

I watched the replay of the fumble by Zeke, as everyone who watched the game did. I disagree with the comments made about clear evidence.

Now let's also get this out of the way. I think it is a huge mistake for the broadcast to have an official second guessing the call. There is a reason baseball does not allow replays of balls and strikes to occur on the stadium big screens. My belief is this exacerbates the fans angst over missed calls. Especially when the "expert" in the booth seems to either get it wrong, or disagrees with the eye in the sky that is the ultimate arbiter.

To me (remember the bias) Zeke's elbow was down. The "expert" suggested the ball was moving, yet - again, to me - it did not move until he hit the ground. The "expert" said he did not have control. Yet the ball was still in the crook of his arm until he touched down.

I could be wrong. Most here that know me can point to those times with ease. But in that scrum, I don't believe the refs had enough information to make that call to begin with.

I also think the completely asinine thought process of reversing the call leaves out a significant aspect. The fact in a scrum, the refs don't have a clear cut view, and therefore cannot make an accurate call. The refs could not possibly see that fumble from any angle they had. So the automatic cannot reverse the call has a flaw that the refs cannot say they just didn't see it correctly.

In Zeke's defense, he usually is really good at covering up. But he, like every other ball carrier will occasionally put it on the ground. I think this was a bang bang play and there was no ref that could clearly see the ball come out and whether is was down or it was a strip.

I surely think the "expert" is just winging it, and find this aspect of the game as a way to stir up the viewing audience. In other words I believe this is a stupid idea.

But again, I believe Zeke was down and there was no clear cut view by the officials on the field to make the initial call, and the "expert" was incorrect in his elbow touching before the ball slipped out.

Just my opinion.

Still frame shows ball secured and elbow down. It was one of those nights, things didn't go our way and we went reverted to old Linehan tendencies. The entire offense was lackluster
 

TwoDeep3

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,389
Reaction score
17,212
Still frame shows ball secured and elbow down. It was one of those nights, things didn't go our way and we went reverted to old Linehan tendencies. The entire offense was lackluster

I agree with your first point and disagree with your second.

It was one of those nights. They happen.

But the Linehan comment I take issue with. Part of the movement pre snap requires the QB to be heard for the snap of the ball for the guys on the wings. It seems to me the only way you can assure that is a pre arranged silent count. The movement would effect that snap count.

I could be wrong. Not taking a shot at you.
 

Alohawg1

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,195
Reaction score
3,907
They were talked into a call none of them saw, then upheld it like cowards because it was too close to reverse. It was bs- they know it, Saints fans know it, and we Cowboy fans know it.
 

Jenky

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,656
Reaction score
4,233
I am biased. Let's get that out there up front.

I watched the replay of the fumble by Zeke, as everyone who watched the game did. I disagree with the comments made about clear evidence.

Now let's also get this out of the way. I think it is a huge mistake for the broadcast to have an official second guessing the call. There is a reason baseball does not allow replays of balls and strikes to occur on the stadium big screens. My belief is this exacerbates the fans angst over missed calls. Especially when the "expert" in the booth seems to either get it wrong, or disagrees with the eye in the sky that is the ultimate arbiter.

To me (remember the bias) Zeke's elbow was down. The "expert" suggested the ball was moving, yet - again, to me - it did not move until he hit the ground. The "expert" said he did not have control. Yet the ball was still in the crook of his arm until he touched down.

I could be wrong. Most here that know me can point to those times with ease. But in that scrum, I don't believe the refs had enough information to make that call to begin with.

I also think the completely asinine thought process of reversing the call leaves out a significant aspect. The fact in a scrum, the refs don't have a clear cut view, and therefore cannot make an accurate call. The refs could not possibly see that fumble from any angle they had. So the automatic cannot reverse the call has a flaw that the refs cannot say they just didn't see it correctly.

In Zeke's defense, he usually is really good at covering up. But he, like every other ball carrier will occasionally put it on the ground. I think this was a bang bang play and there was no ref that could clearly see the ball come out and whether is was down or it was a strip.

I surely think the "expert" is just winging it, and find this aspect of the game as a way to stir up the viewing audience. In other words I believe this is a stupid idea.

But again, I believe Zeke was down and there was no clear cut view by the officials on the field to make the initial call, and the "expert" was incorrect in his elbow touching before the ball slipped out.

Just my opinion.

It wasn't a fumble but they ruled it a fumble on the field. Then when they went to watch the reply, they saw inconclusive evidence to overturn the call is the excuse they are using.
 

visionary

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,604
Reaction score
32,005
I am biased. Let's get that out there up front.

I watched the replay of the fumble by Zeke, as everyone who watched the game did. I disagree with the comments made about clear evidence.

Now let's also get this out of the way. I think it is a huge mistake for the broadcast to have an official second guessing the call. There is a reason baseball does not allow replays of balls and strikes to occur on the stadium big screens. My belief is this exacerbates the fans angst over missed calls. Especially when the "expert" in the booth seems to either get it wrong, or disagrees with the eye in the sky that is the ultimate arbiter.

To me (remember the bias) Zeke's elbow was down. The "expert" suggested the ball was moving, yet - again, to me - it did not move until he hit the ground. The "expert" said he did not have control. Yet the ball was still in the crook of his arm until he touched down.

I could be wrong. Most here that know me can point to those times with ease. But in that scrum, I don't believe the refs had enough information to make that call to begin with.

I also think the completely asinine thought process of reversing the call leaves out a significant aspect. The fact in a scrum, the refs don't have a clear cut view, and therefore cannot make an accurate call. The refs could not possibly see that fumble from any angle they had. So the automatic cannot reverse the call has a flaw that the refs cannot say they just didn't see it correctly.

In Zeke's defense, he usually is really good at covering up. But he, like every other ball carrier will occasionally put it on the ground. I think this was a bang bang play and there was no ref that could clearly see the ball come out and whether is was down or it was a strip.

I surely think the "expert" is just winging it, and find this aspect of the game as a way to stir up the viewing audience. In other words I believe this is a stupid idea.

But again, I believe Zeke was down and there was no clear cut view by the officials on the field to make the initial call, and the "expert" was incorrect in his elbow touching before the ball slipped out.

Just my opinion.

I agree with you so you have that going for you
:thumbup:
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
37,710
Reaction score
34,740
Hang onto the football and then we wouldn't need super slow motion replay to determine if he was down 0.01 seconds prior to the ball coming out.

Elliott fumbled six times last year and only lost one of them. Law of averages worked against him in this one and hopefully, have him being a little more careful with the ball.
 

TwoDeep3

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,389
Reaction score
17,212
:hammer:

Especially when you're going to hold out for big money. Emmitt Smith didn't put the ball on the ground in critical moments.

Straw man argument. His money had zero to do with his play last night. Further, the post you are replying to is another straw man. How many times have you seen a player leap out of the pile with the ball and run like he was the one who recovered it? Yet the runner was down. What happens in a pile is not necessarily the fault of the running back or ball carrier.

So when Zeke was scoring touchdowns in the previous games, were you posting he was living up to his money? I doubt it.

By the way, Emmitt, as a Cowboy, had 55 fumbles. So your posts suggests you know every one and not one was in a critical time in the game. Is that right?
 

sunalsorises

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,905
Reaction score
4,628
The officials seem to let turnovers play out so the replay will automatically kick in and help with the correct call. The problem is the call on the field has to be reversed by irrefutable evidence which is a tough standard in cases like Zeke’s fumble. With the Dak forward pass it was much clearer.
 
Top