PAPPYDOG
There are no Dak haters just Cowboy lovers!!!
- Messages
- 18,847
- Reaction score
- 32,440
Stephen doesn't control Jerry, and this is not the first time the team has shown restraint in a contract situation.
Ok then.....
Stephen doesn't control Jerry, and this is not the first time the team has shown restraint in a contract situation.
That's a lot of years but in 2 years or less, 40 million per year most likely won't be top 10 salary.
Meaning …?Ok then.....
Lawrence doesn't have 2 sacks - he has 5. Still not what we would hope, but lets not exaggerate to make a point.Lets hope not. We over pay everyone. Lawrence got 120 mil plus and i dont think he has 2 sacks. We still need to sign Cooper. We got problems......
TRUTH !!!!!
I like, not love, Dak - but that's just crazy. What kind of team will be around him with that contract?
Meaning …?
Lock Jerry up, if he tries offers that contract !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!How about no. I like Dak and would pay him as much or a little more than goff. But not 40..
The amount per season and length are really irrelevent, the only thing that matters is the garanteed money, i would not like to guess at what it would be on a contract that big or long but you would have to think at least 200M, which is ridiculous and if your Dak why sign for that long without that kind of guarantee? So it will never happen
You still aren't making sense. The fact they haven't signed Dak to a contract doesn't somehow automatically mean Stephen is contradicting or counteracting Jerry.
Jerry and company like to sign guys where they can restructure if need be, so I'm sure that should be in the contract.And Dak likely would want to renegotiate if that was the case. I get the inflated salaries for QBs but overpaying now won't make him keep quiet when other QBs begin to surpass that avg. etc