1-14-10 Mock

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,431
Reaction score
48,247
Any Mock that has us trading up or down before the draft begins is a total crapshoot.

We all know Jerry (and help) make those decisions on the fly based on how the draft is falling for them. It would be incredibly moronic to do otherwise unless you were at or near the top of the board (and the mystery reduced).

Having said that, these mocks are for fun and that's what this board is all about! So have some fun with it!
 

junk

I've got moxie
Messages
9,294
Reaction score
247
DFWJC;3229703 said:
Any Mock that has us trading up or down before the draft begins is a total crapshoot.

Any mock is a total crapshoot.
 

UnoDallas

Benched
Messages
5,914
Reaction score
0
DaBoys4Life;3228951 said:
Indeed it's a big fall of from Koiser to Proctor. Holland wasn't bad when Holland went out and we had to go back to Proctor then that is when it became a problem. I don't play madden just because I'm young and like video games doesn't mean I play madden. With that said the O Line depth we have is more than solid.Especially at the interior positions.

so your countimng on

Holland - Procter - and Mcq as our backups

some all pro talent there

I rather give Brewster - Bright a chance
 

DaBoys4Life

Benched
Messages
15,626
Reaction score
0
UnoDallas;3230618 said:
so your countimng on

Holland - Procter - and Mcq as our backups

some all pro talent there

I rather give Brewster - Bright a chance


Brewster is option.
 

The Realist

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,504
Reaction score
2,027
DaBoys4Life;3230670 said:
Brewster is option.

Again, you are not making sense.

You just said OL depth at interior positions is better than it is at OT.

Yet, everyone saw the wheels fall off when Kosier went down last year and the we kept on rolling with Free when Colombo went down.
 
Top