DBOY3141;2941399 said:Since the loss of Plax, that's what the Giants average on offense. They scored 17 yesterday. No way are they much better than us, as the media keeps saying.
Oh by the way, they lost Nicks for 2-3 weeks.
they have good dbs. the giants dbs are better than our dbs imo especially at safety.HoosierCowboy;2941415 said:I'm with ya--we may think differently after we play them but I will not be surprised if we beat them by 20. They are strong up front but have weak receivers and DBs.
Rampage;2941425 said:they have good dbs. the giants dbs are better than our dbs imo especially at safety.
DBOY3141;2941399 said:Since the loss of Plax, that's what the Giants average on offense. They scored 17 yesterday. No way are they much better than us, as the media keeps saying.
Oh by the way, they lost Nicks for 2-3 weeks.
Pretty sure he was referencing the offense, not the total score.irishline;2941490 said:Um... Not that I don't get your point but the Commanders scored 17. The Giants scored 23.:
irishline;2941490 said:Um... Not that I don't get your point but the Commanders scored 17. The Giants scored 23.:
Wrangler87;2941428 said:We can probably outscore them. I see a lot of the 1982 SanDiego Chargers in this team. Our average scores will probably be 42-35 or around that.
DBOY3141;2941501 said:Giants defense had 1 TD yesterday. Offense scored 17. Point of my thread is, Giants offense is weak.
MarionBarberThe4th;2941503 said:Call me crazy, but your prediction of 35 PPG allowed is very high. I can not agree.
Again, you establish that math and the concept of averages is not your strength.Wrangler87;2941428 said:We can probably outscore them. I see a lot of the 1982 SanDiego Chargers in this team. Our average scores will probably be 42-35 or around that.
Wrangler87;2941428 said:Our average scores will probably be 42-35 or around that.
SLATEmosphere;2941418 said:We just to put 8 in the box and see if Hixon/Boss and Manning beat us.