1967/1968 - Were The Doors better than both The Beatles and The Stones

[Sarek]

 

[Sarek]

 

[Sarek]

 

[mrmojo]

My unbiased opinion..........Yes

 

[nightrain]

Love the Doors and Stones. Not a fan of the Beatles.

As much as I was into the Doors, can't put them above the Stones.

 

[Sarek]

Love the Doors and Stones. Not a fan of the Beatles.

As much as I was into the Doors, can't put them above the Stones.

No one can keep up with The Stones 69-73, but 67/68 Stones we're still changing into the powerhouse they would become.

I can see Morrison influencing Mick Jagger with the raw no rules performances in America/Europe 67/68. By 68 you can see Mick Jagger is developing a nastier side during the Rock and Roll Circus performance.

Rock fans always talk Beatles Stones but i think The Doors might have been the best Rock & Roll band for a very brief period of time between 67/68.

 

[Hardline]

I like all three equally.

 

[DanteEXT]

No

 

[MWH1967]

Does it really matter?

 

[BrAinPaiNt]

Love the Doors. But No.

Always been curious if Jim had not died if they would have continued and grow even more.
Seems like he was getting bored with it.

 

[pete026]

Liked all three but thinking about it; can't really compare them because musically, they are so different.

 

[Runwildboys]

No, not even close to either, IMO.

 

[Pola_pe_a]

I like The Doors better than the other two but I don’t think you can call them better,

I can only imagine what Jim Morrison would’ve evolved into. He and Yoko Ono could take turns putting out weirder and weirder avante garde BS.