ZeroClub
just trying to get better
- Messages
- 7,619
- Reaction score
- 1
masomenos85;3294030 said:I think you may have missed the point a little bit. We don't really draft based on need, instead we tend to draft the best player who falls to us. As it turns out, a lot of times, that best player happens to be very athletic. We can take one of two things from that, either it's coincidence or a players athleticism factors highly into our grade. This may seem like a given but it's not. Some teams are more willing to take less polished, athletic guys and others look for more polished players, even if they aren't the most athletic. It's a difference in draft philosophy that boils down to what kind of risk/reward ratio teams are willing to take. The Cowboys tend to be willing to invest fairly high draft picks and take risks on athletic guys who need development (e.g. Martellus Bennett, Jason Williams, Isiah Stanback, etc). Even position conversions projects like Anthony Spencer tend to carry higher risks. To a large extent, the first three factors you list are non-issues for Dallas and don't seem to get much consideration.
The other two factors are what I was trying to delve into, namely, who do we rate highly (unpolished athletes over polished, less athletic players) and what types of players do we most often draft (players who have strength in the passing games).
The Anthony Spencer pick felt a lot like a need pick to me. The Cowboys seemed to know exactly what they needed -- a guy who could, in a year or two, start for the aging Greg Ellis. The team targeted Spencer and executed a few trades so that they didn't take Spencer too early (or miss him by going too late.)
It also could be argued that CB was a need pick the year Jenkins was drafted. The Cowboys picked Jenkins to be the guy who could, in a year or two, start for the somewhat disappointing Anthony Henry.
I could easily see the Cowboys applying similar logic to this draft by targeting a few OL who could, in a year or two, start at G or OT.