2003 season vs. 2005 season

juck

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,246
Reaction score
244
which do u guys think is a better team?I think they are very similiar.If we can build on this season and add a few parts needed next year should be a dominant force.we get terrell owens,we are the "team".period.im ready for some dominance.
 
I'll take 2005's version, simply due to the fact that both versions had great Ds, yet 2005's is done by getting to the QB w/o bringing everybody, and forcing TOs, not to mention facing much better offenses
 
The 2005 team because it will get better in 2006. The 2003 team got worse in 2004.
 
Bledsoe > Carter
Julius > Hambrick
MBIII > Cason
Henry > ....

This team by far. And like Joseephuss said, this team will be better next year
 
I'm not sure you will find anyone who will say 2003, except the Carter Lovers like katr and the like.
 
we were a fluke team in 03 this year we are for real and getting much better.
 
NewEraCowboy said:
we were a fluke team in 03 this year we are for real and getting much better.

They were not a fluke team. They had holes and you try to fix those holes before the next season. They didn't and some holes got bigger such as Wiley being much worse than Ekuban and the rotation at RCB being worse than Mario Edwards. No one could have expected that to occur. No one predicted losing Woodson either. That is just on defense. Similar and weird things happend on the other side of the ball, too. I don't forsee those kinds of things happening between now and next season.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,054
Messages
13,786,155
Members
23,771
Latest member
LandryHat
Back
Top