cowboys5xsbs
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,881
- Reaction score
- 20,352
The number 2 pick would be amazing in this draft to be fair
ChatGPT wrote that slop.Anyone see this article…?
Probably shouldn’t even play some of the games and just work on trying to get the number one pick…./s
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...game-predictions-playoffs-super-bowl-champion
Not really was in response to your statement of the negative posters have control due to numbers and are successful in what they do. It followed your own statement. The remainder stands on it's own merit as to what is involved as well. Respect being the outcome and not ridicule.You lost me at 'not really'.
lolAnyone see this article…?
Probably shouldn’t even play some of the games and just work on trying to get the number one pick…./s
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...game-predictions-playoffs-super-bowl-champion
I bet anyone we end up with more than 4 wins....absolutely laughableAnyone see this article…?
Probably shouldn’t even play some of the games and just work on trying to get the number one pick…./s
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...game-predictions-playoffs-super-bowl-champion
...what?Not really was in response to your statement of the negative posters have control due to numbers and are successful in what they do.
You gave an attaboy on their success...no implication involved. Now you saying that meant something akin to humor?...what?
Nothing, absolutely nothing about my statement says or suggests 'negative posters' have control due to numbers--unless you believe they are in control of your perception that they are the majority opinion on this board. I understand where you are coming from if it is the latter.
OMG. My comment was even re-posted and still misinterpreted.You gave an attaboy on their success...no implication involved. Now you saying that meant something akin to humor?
Take a reread:
I must hand it to Prescott critics. They are a smaller group on this board, who create an excessive volume of threads and posts, which are interpreted by a larger group, a.k.a. Prescott supporters, as 'most of the board'.
Prescott critics have made the Fan Zone their version of the Grecian Trojan Horse. lol. I do not believe that group perception is held vice versa.
You state they are successful at annoyance...that's their direction by choice to someone just attempting topical discussion. Now tell me that isn't the fact also...Oh, I can handle it. But the fact remains by other's choices.
No, different reference points and reasons for them were addressed. I was in Law School for a year. A paralegal/court reporter for about 5 years...a Custom MP for three. As well as a Correctional Officer also. I have a different set of observation points...not attacking your view of sports, here.OMG. My comment was even re-posted and still misinterpreted.
Okay. I will give this one last final shot. This is what I suggest.No, different reference points and reasons for them were addressed. I was in Law School for a year. A paralegal/court reporter for about 5 years...a Custom MP for three. As well as a Correctional Officer also. I have a different set of observation points...not attacking your view of sports, here.
You merely refuse to listen to those for purpose of a discussion...that is your choice not a result of my intent.
It’s one of the most stupid “articles”, I’ve ever seen.Anyone see this article…?
Probably shouldn’t even play some of the games and just work on trying to get the number one pick…./s
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...game-predictions-playoffs-super-bowl-champion
It is one of the more unique clickbait offerings the company has ever generated.They ran 20,000 simulations and found the *one* thst had the Cowboys absolutely suck, and then wrote an entire piece built around simulation 3,318.
Cut to the chase...ask the liquor store guy!It is one of the more unique clickbait offerings the company has ever generated.
But, but, but….. it’s analytics based so it must be accurate.Lmao. Absolutely terrible.
They may not win a Super Bowl. But this is the furthest from a 4-13 worst record in the nfl team
Wonder which sim had us hoisting the Lombardi.Anyone see this article…?
Probably shouldn’t even play some of the games and just work on trying to get the number one pick…./s
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...game-predictions-playoffs-super-bowl-champion
You know what, lol. The so called "haters" are saying the same thing about the Daksters. That they're in the majority and hostile towards any differently thinking folks.Right...instead of just having good threads with real fans we can have a small group of people who ruin threads with there Dak hate to provoke as you put it "Dak supporters" myself? I call them Cowboy fans but potato potata.
Yep that's the Eagles forum Cowboyzone for ya.